Pirjo Inki
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Markku JalkanenKristina Gemzell‐DanielssonHannu LarjavaDiana MansourReidar GrénmanAndrew M. KaunitzOlli OksalaRaija Tammi
- Topics
- Reproductive Health and Contraception (18 papers)Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (15 papers)Endometriosis Research and Treatment (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyBritish Journal of Cancer
- Partner nations
- FinlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Pirjo Inki
46 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cell Biology 706
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 626
- Molecular Biology 548
- Reproductive Medicine 461
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 446
Countries citing papers authored by Pirjo Inki
This map shows the geographic impact of Pirjo Inki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pirjo Inki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pirjo Inki more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pirjo Inki
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pirjo Inki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pirjo Inki. The network helps show where Pirjo Inki may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pirjo Inki
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pirjo Inki. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pirjo Inki based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pirjo Inki. Pirjo Inki is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 91 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 102 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 240 | |
| 19 | 140 | |
| 20 | 62 |
About Pirjo Inki
Pirjo Inki is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Cell Biology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (18 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (15 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (446 citations), Reproductive Medicine (461 citations) and Cell Biology (706 citations). Pirjo Inki has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Markku Jalkanen, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Hannu Larjava, Diana Mansour, Reidar Grénman, Andrew M. Kaunitz, Olli Oksala, Raija Tammi, Lari Häkkinen and Timothy J. Salo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.