Piper Gaubatz
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sainan LinWeiping WuPaul WheatleyDean M. HaninkWilliam JankowiakNancy Shatzman SteinhardtPradyumna P. Karan
- Topics
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers)Urbanization and City Planning (4 papers)Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Piper Gaubatz
18 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Political Science and International Relations 222
- Urban Studies 197
- Sociology and Political Science 194
- Global and Planetary Change 105
- Economics and Econometrics 97
Countries citing papers authored by Piper Gaubatz
This map shows the geographic impact of Piper Gaubatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piper Gaubatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piper Gaubatz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Piper Gaubatz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piper Gaubatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piper Gaubatz. The network helps show where Piper Gaubatz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Piper Gaubatz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Piper Gaubatz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Piper Gaubatz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Piper Gaubatz. Piper Gaubatz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | Looking West towards Mecca: Muslim Enclaves in Chinese Frontier Cities | 2 |
| 5 | 68 | |
| 6 | Mosques and Markets: Traditional Urban Form on China's Northwestern Frontiers | 1 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | The Chinese City | 36 |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 224 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Beyond the Great Wall | 15 |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 37 |
About Piper Gaubatz
Piper Gaubatz is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (4 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (197 citations), Transportation (88 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (222 citations). Piper Gaubatz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sainan Lin, Weiping Wu, Paul Wheatley, Dean M. Hanink, William Jankowiak, Nancy Shatzman Steinhardt and Pradyumna P. Karan. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Urban Studies and Habitat International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.