Pio-Go Hsieh
- Civil and Structural Engineering top 0.5%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 0.1%
- General Engineering top 1%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Building and Construction
- Topics
- Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (23 papers)Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (23 papers)Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (13 papers)
In The Last Decade
Pio-Go Hsieh
24 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Civil and Structural Engineering 1.4k
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1.3k
- General Engineering 129
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 71
- Building and Construction 43
Countries citing papers authored by Pio-Go Hsieh
This map shows the geographic impact of Pio-Go Hsieh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pio-Go Hsieh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pio-Go Hsieh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pio-Go Hsieh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pio-Go Hsieh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pio-Go Hsieh. The network helps show where Pio-Go Hsieh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pio-Go Hsieh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pio-Go Hsieh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pio-Go Hsieh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pio-Go Hsieh. Pio-Go Hsieh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | Electro-Osmotic With Injection of Microbial for Strengthening Clay | 1 |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | Application of Electroosmotic Chemical Treatment to Improve Soft Clay in Practice | 1 |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 94 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 375 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | USE OF THE MODIFIED HYPERBOLIC MODEL IN EXCAVATION ANALYSIS UNDER UNDRAINED CONDITION | 13 |
| 20 | 341 |
About Pio-Go Hsieh
Pio-Go Hsieh is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, General Engineering and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (23 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (23 papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (1.3k citations), General Engineering (129 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (1.4k citations). Pio-Go Hsieh has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Chang‐Yu Ou, Aswin Lim, C.-Y. Ou, Fuchen Teng, Huchang Liao, Chiang Shih and Shao-Chi Chien. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Canadian Geotechnical Journal and Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.