Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays
1993412 citationsR. J. Mair, R.N. Taylor et al.Géotechniqueprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R.N. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.N. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.N. Taylor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.N. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.N. Taylor. The network helps show where R.N. Taylor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.N. Taylor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.N. Taylor.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.N. Taylor based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R.N. Taylor. R.N. Taylor is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Taylor, R.N., et al.. (2013). Pile and Pile Group Capacity: Some Findings from Centrifuge Tests. City Research Online (City University London).3 indexed citations
9.
Stone, K.J.L., et al.. (2013). Modelling of monopile-footing foundation system for offshore structures. City Research Online (City University London).3 indexed citations
10.
Sentenac, Philippe, R.N. Taylor, R. J. Lynch, & M. D. Bolton. (2006). Butanol effect on consolidated clay. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. 6(4). 19–27.3 indexed citations
11.
Taylor, R.N., et al.. (2004). The influence of enhanced excavation base stiffness on prop loads and ground movements during basement construction. City Research Online (City University London).1 indexed citations
12.
Grant, Richard & R.N. Taylor. (2000). Stability Of Tunnels In Clay With Overlying Layers Of Coarse Grained Soil. ISRM International Symposium.5 indexed citations
13.
Grant, R.J. & R.N. Taylor. (2000). Tunnelling-induced ground movements in clay. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering. 143(1). 43–55.38 indexed citations
Mair, R. J., R.N. Taylor, & J. B. Burland. (1996). Prediction of ground movements and assessment of risk of building damage due to bored tunnelling. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database. 713–718.129 indexed citations
18.
Mair, R. J., et al.. (1996). A methodology for evaluating potential damage to cast iron pipes induced by tunnelling. 659–664.11 indexed citations
19.
Mair, R. J., et al.. (1993). Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays. Géotechnique. 43(2). 315–320.412 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Mair, R. J. & R.N. Taylor. (1993). PREDICTION OF CLAY BEHAVIOUR AROUND TUNNELS USING PLASTICITY SOLUTIONS.23 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.