Ping Ding

584 citations
35 papers · 448 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Ding

34 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Ping Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pharmacology 99
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 91
  • Toxicology 16
  • Pharmacology 61
  • Food Science 63
Replace Hemavathy Harikrishnan with:
Hemavathy Harikrishnan Malaysia
Xinchuan Zheng China
Yuh-Chi Kuo Taiwan
Xiuli Wu China
Nilton Syogo Arakawa Brazil
Rocky Graziose United States
Krishan Avtar Suri India
Agula Bo China
Sun Young Jung South Korea
Juan Huang China
Ping Ding relative to Hemavathy Harikrishnan Malaysia Hemavathy Harikrishnan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hemavathy Harikrishnan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Ding. The network helps show where Ping Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Ding Line = papers co-authored together Ping Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201950
2 202047
3 202040
4 201740
5 202139
6 202035
7 202128
8 201521
9 202117
10 201517
11 202213
12 201913
13 202112
14 202111
15 20218
16 20158
17 20227
18 20157
19 20205
20 20205

About Ping Ding

Ping Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Morinda citrifolia extract uses (9 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (7 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (99 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (91 citations), Toxicology (16 citations), Pharmacology (61 citations) and Food Science (63 citations). Ping Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, South Korea and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Shaozhen Hou, Depo Yang, Shuxian Chen, Zhimin Zhao, Yonger Chen, Xiao‐Ping Lai, Tijiang Shan, Junli Gao, Ziling Mao and Jie Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Horticulturae and Microbiological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact