Ping Ding

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
95 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Ping Ding is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ping Ding has authored 95 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 44 papers in Ecology and 32 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Ping Ding's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (42 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (29 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (27 papers). Ping Ding is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (42 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (29 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (27 papers). Ping Ding collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Ping Ding's co-authors include Xingfeng Si, Yanping Wang, Andrés Baselga, Mingjian Yu, Di Zeng, Yuhao Zhao, Guang Hu, Jianguo Wu, Stuart L. Pimm and Kenneth J. Feeley and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Ping Ding

87 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key ... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ping Ding China 27 1.3k 1.2k 803 664 482 95 2.3k
Michael P. Nobis Switzerland 25 934 0.7× 1.2k 1.0× 757 0.9× 1.0k 1.5× 611 1.3× 56 2.4k
Deborah Faria Brazil 29 1.2k 0.9× 1.2k 1.0× 1.2k 1.5× 460 0.7× 892 1.9× 81 2.7k
Brian Maitner United States 22 664 0.5× 836 0.7× 551 0.7× 605 0.9× 460 1.0× 46 1.7k
Òscar Gordo Spain 17 1.4k 1.1× 722 0.6× 861 1.1× 1.0k 1.5× 646 1.3× 38 2.6k
Neil Brummitt United Kingdom 23 763 0.6× 979 0.8× 948 1.2× 1.0k 1.6× 412 0.9× 45 2.3k
Pavel Kratina United Kingdom 28 1.7k 1.3× 996 0.8× 677 0.8× 400 0.6× 597 1.2× 72 2.9k
Christine Römermann Germany 28 995 0.8× 1.5k 1.3× 895 1.1× 981 1.5× 645 1.3× 70 2.6k
Gerold Kier Germany 10 759 0.6× 1.2k 1.0× 1.0k 1.3× 817 1.2× 458 1.0× 13 2.4k
Peter M. Jørgensen United States 24 664 0.5× 1.4k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 855 1.3× 493 1.0× 49 2.6k
Nina Farwig Germany 29 1.1k 0.8× 1.5k 1.3× 1.4k 1.7× 469 0.7× 444 0.9× 116 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Ding. The network helps show where Ping Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ping Ding

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ping Ding. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ping Ding based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ping Ding. Ping Ding is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Li, Wande, Ingo Graß, Thomas Hiller, et al.. (2025). Spatiotemporal dynamics of migratory birds reshape seed dispersal and conservation implications on fragmented islands. Biological Conservation. 309. 111283–111283.
2.
Zeng, Di, Thomas J. Matthews, Rui Wang, et al.. (2025). Defaunation erodes the diversity of rodent personality traits in fragmented forests. Journal of Animal Ecology. 94(10). 2047–2061.
3.
Sun, Minghao, Ahimsa Campos‐Arceiz, Wande Li, et al.. (2025). Underrated Links Mitigate the Fragmentation‐Induced Mutualism Breakdown in a Large‐Fruited Species. Conservation Letters. 18(4).
4.
Ye, Zhiming, Ping Ding, Yan Wang, et al.. (2024). Epithelial mitochondrial fission-mediated PANoptosis is crucial for ulcerative colitis and its inhibition by saquinavir through Drp1. Pharmacological Research. 210. 107538–107538. 12 indexed citations
5.
6.
Ren, Peng, et al.. (2023). Forest edges increase pollinator network robustness to extinction with declining area. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7(3). 393–404. 31 indexed citations
7.
Si, Xingfeng, et al.. (2022). An integrated animal tracking technology combining a GPS tracking system with a UAV. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 14(2). 505–511. 11 indexed citations
8.
Li, Wande, Ingo Graß, Diego P. Vázquez, et al.. (2022). Plant-frugivore network simplification under habitat fragmentation leaves a small core of interacting generalists. Communications Biology. 5(1). 1214–1214. 26 indexed citations
9.
Chen, Chuanwu, Marcel Holyoak, Yanping Wang, Xingfeng Si, & Ping Ding. (2019). Spatiotemporal distribution of seasonal bird assemblages on land-bridge islands: linking dynamic and static views of metacommunities. Avian Research. 10(1). 4 indexed citations
10.
Ren, Peng, et al.. (2019). Seasonal variation in the distribution of Elliot’s pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti) in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science. 27(1). 13–23. 6 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Chuanwu, Marcel Holyoak, Xingfeng Si, Yanping Wang, & Ping Ding. (2017). Do seasonal species assemblages differ in their biogeography? Evidence from the spatial structure of bird communities on land‐bridge islands. Journal of Biogeography. 45(2). 473–483. 14 indexed citations
12.
Ding, Zhifeng, Kenneth J. Feeley, Huijian Hu, & Ping Ding. (2015). Bird guild loss and its determinants on subtropical land-bridge islands, China. Avian Research. 6(1). 8 indexed citations
13.
Si, Xingfeng, Andrés Baselga, Fabien Leprieur, Xiao Song, & Ping Ding. (2015). Selective extinction drives taxonomic and functional alpha and beta diversities in island bird assemblages. Journal of Animal Ecology. 85(2). 409–418. 144 indexed citations
14.
Ding, Ping, Xiao‐Ping Lai, Jiangang Wang, et al.. (2012). Status and Trends of GAP Base Construction of Chinese Materia Medica in Guangdong Province. Chinese Herbal Medicines. 4(1). 33–42. 3 indexed citations
15.
Ding, Ping, et al.. (2010). Calculation of Online Total Transfer Capability in Bulk Interconnected Grid Integrating Rationality and Security Principle. Proceedings of the CSEE. 3 indexed citations
16.
Ding, Ping. (2008). Determination of monotropein from Radix Morindae officinalis by HPLC. Huaxi yaoxue zazhi. 1 indexed citations
17.
Ding, Ping. (2008). Content Determination of Monotropein in the Different Parts of Morinda officinalis and Its Counterfeit Species. Traditional Chinese Drug Research and Clinical Pharmacology. 4 indexed citations
18.
Ding, Ping. (2005). Analysis on Genuineness of Amomum Villosum Lour.from Different Habitats by RAPD. Traditional Chinese Drug Research and Clinical Pharmacology. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ding, Ping, Fang Qin, & Danyan Zhang. (2004). Comparative studies on bioactivities of Yunnan introduced Amomum villosum and Amomum villosum. Zhōnghuá yàoxué zázhì. 39(5). 342–344. 3 indexed citations
20.
Ding, Ping, et al.. (2004). GC fingerprint of components of Amomum villousm and its counterfeit species. Huaxi yaoxue zazhi. 19(5). 330–332. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026