Nina Farwig

8.1k citations
116 papers · 2.6k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Nina Farwig

106 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Nina Farwig
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.5k
  • Ecological Modeling 469
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
  • Ecology 1.1k
  • Forestry 99
Replace Ernesto I. Badano with:
Ernesto I. Badano Mexico
Christa P. H. Mulder United States
David L. Gorchov United States
Salomón Aguilar United States
Marco Aurélio Pizo Brazil
Daniel G. Wenny United States
Julio M. Alcántara Spain
Alan J. A. Stewart United Kingdom
Allan E. Strand United States
Trond H. Larsen United States
Nina Farwig relative to Ernesto I. Badano Mexico Ernesto I. Badano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Ernesto I. Badano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Farwig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Farwig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Farwig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Farwig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Farwig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Farwig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Farwig. The network helps show where Nina Farwig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Farwig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Farwig Line = papers co-authored together Nina Farwig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017208
2 2012107
3 2005100
4 200879
5 201778
6 201877
7 201276
8 202175
9 200974
10 200768
11 200864
12 201664
13 200759
14 201659
15 200757
16 201156
17 201449
18 201446
19 201944
20 201344

About Nina Farwig

Nina Farwig is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 116 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (75 papers), Plant and animal studies (51 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (27 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (26 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (18 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (13 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (8 papers) and Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.5k citations), Ecological Modeling (469 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations), Ecology (1.1k citations) and Forestry (99 citations). Nina Farwig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Poland and Ecuador. Frequent co-authors include Katrin Böhning‐Gaese, Dana G. Berens, Jörg Albrecht, Eike Lena Neuschulz, Roland Brandl, Dana G. Schabo, Bärbel Bleher, Ingo Graß, Alexandra Botzat and Bogdan Jaroszewicz. Their work appears in journals such as Basic and Applied Ecology, Biotropica, Journal of Tropical Ecology, Oecologia and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact