Pin-Cheng Lin

401 citations
16 papers · 285 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Pin-Cheng Lin

16 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Pin-Cheng Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Materials Chemistry 196
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 47
  • Electrochemistry 17
  • Catalysis 17
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 100
Replace Yousil Lee with:
Yousil Lee South Korea
Yuan Yin China
Pavel Galář Czechia
Junlei Qi Hong Kong
Yo Seob Won South Korea
Tomo‐o Terasawa Japan
Rini Singh India
R. Reshmi Krishnan India
S. Dolai India
Kyung Ju Park South Korea
Pin-Cheng Lin relative to Yousil Lee South Korea Yousil Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Yousil Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pin-Cheng Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pin-Cheng Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pin-Cheng Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pin-Cheng Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pin-Cheng Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pin-Cheng Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pin-Cheng Lin. The network helps show where Pin-Cheng Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pin-Cheng Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pin-Cheng Lin Line = papers co-authored together Pin-Cheng Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201647
2 202138
3 202029
4 202125
5 202124
6 201723
7 202021
8 201919
9 202013
10 202212
11 202111
12 20199
13 20227
14 20155
15 20171
16 20221

About Pin-Cheng Lin

Pin-Cheng Lin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Electrochemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (6 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (3 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (3 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (3 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (2 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (1 paper) and Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (196 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (47 citations), Electrochemistry (17 citations), Catalysis (17 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (100 citations). Pin-Cheng Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jan Fransaer, G. Reza Yazdi, L. M. C. Pereira, Koen Binnemans, Mikael Syväjärvi, Susann Schmidt, Martin Eriksson, Harsh Bana, P. O. Holtz and M. Asghar. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Nanomaterials, Optical Materials, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and ACS Nano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact