Pim A. D. van Dijk
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- General Health Professions
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Christopher W. DiGiovanniJohn G. KennedyGino M. M. J. KerkhoffsArianna L. GianakosBryan G. VopatBart LubbertsChristopher P. ChiodoC. Niek van Dijk
- Topics
- Foot and Ankle Surgery (10 papers)Tendon Structure and Treatment (7 papers)Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers)
- Journals
- The American Journal of SurgeryKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology ArthroscopyJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Pim A. D. van Dijk
14 papers receiving 186 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 153
- Surgery 92
- Biomedical Engineering 28
- General Health Professions 15
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 14
Countries citing papers authored by Pim A. D. van Dijk
This map shows the geographic impact of Pim A. D. van Dijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pim A. D. van Dijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pim A. D. van Dijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pim A. D. van Dijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pim A. D. van Dijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pim A. D. van Dijk. The network helps show where Pim A. D. van Dijk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pim A. D. van Dijk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pim A. D. van Dijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pim A. D. van Dijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pim A. D. van Dijk. Pim A. D. van Dijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | Patient Complaints Emphasize Non-Technical Aspects of Care at a Tertiary Referral Hospital. | 16 |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 3 |
About Pim A. D. van Dijk
Pim A. D. van Dijk is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pharmacy and Surgery, having authored 14 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (10 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (7 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (153 citations), Pharmacy (11 citations) and Surgery (92 citations). Pim A. D. van Dijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher W. DiGiovanni, John G. Kennedy, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs, Arianna L. Gianakos, Bryan G. Vopat, Bart Lubberts, Christopher P. Chiodo, C. Niek van Dijk and James Calder. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy and Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.