Daniel Guss

2.0k total citations
108 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Daniel Guss is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Guss has authored 108 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 87 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 57 papers in Surgery and 22 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Daniel Guss's work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (77 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (53 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (34 papers). Daniel Guss is often cited by papers focused on Foot and Ankle Surgery (77 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (53 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (34 papers). Daniel Guss collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Daniel Guss's co-authors include Christopher W. DiGiovanni, Bart Lubberts, Gregory R. Waryasz, Noortje Hagemeijer, Timothy Bhattacharyya, Rohan Bhimani, Bryan G. Vopat, Soheil Ashkani‐Esfahani, Jesse B. Jupiter and David Ring and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Guss

94 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Guss United States 22 824 688 247 144 141 108 1.2k
Justin D. Orr United States 21 630 0.8× 761 1.1× 299 1.2× 203 1.4× 111 0.8× 63 1.2k
David I. Pedowitz United States 21 846 1.0× 731 1.1× 340 1.4× 172 1.2× 68 0.5× 88 1.3k
James Carr United States 21 784 1.0× 968 1.4× 265 1.1× 278 1.9× 213 1.5× 69 1.5k
Rachel Shakked United States 17 500 0.6× 384 0.6× 199 0.8× 66 0.5× 131 0.9× 56 835
Stephen J. Pinney United States 21 1.2k 1.4× 608 0.9× 548 2.2× 162 1.1× 239 1.7× 43 1.5k
Ashish Shah United States 16 457 0.6× 646 0.9× 93 0.4× 96 0.7× 84 0.6× 143 1.0k
Jussi P. Repo Finland 16 303 0.4× 559 0.8× 220 0.9× 84 0.6× 40 0.3× 104 876
Christopher J. Vertullo Australia 24 989 1.2× 1.6k 2.3× 403 1.6× 76 0.5× 99 0.7× 78 1.9k
Matthew J. Salzler United States 17 309 0.4× 770 1.1× 128 0.5× 137 1.0× 40 0.3× 86 1.0k
Stefan Zech Germany 20 973 1.2× 712 1.0× 460 1.9× 273 1.9× 306 2.2× 66 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Guss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Guss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Guss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Guss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Guss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Guss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Guss. The network helps show where Daniel Guss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Guss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Guss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Guss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Guss. Daniel Guss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ashkani‐Esfahani, Soheil, Gregory R. Waryasz, Jeremy T. Smith, et al.. (2025). Surgeon Preferences, Surgical Location, and Timing of Repair Drive Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair Cost. Foot & Ankle International. 46(9). 1039–1048.
2.
Ashkani‐Esfahani, Soheil, et al.. (2024). Association of Extraosseous Arterial Diameter With Talar Dome Osteochondral Lesions. Foot & Ankle International. 45(11). 1199–1209.
3.
4.
Mathur, Vasundhara, et al.. (2024). Critical Portions of a Foot or Ankle Surgical Procedure From Patient and Surgeon Perspectives. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 32(16). 754–761. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ashkani‐Esfahani, Soheil, Rohan Bhimani, Gregory R. Waryasz, et al.. (2024). Automation improves the efficiency of weightbearing CT scan 3D volumetric assessments of the syndesmosis. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 30(8). 652–655. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bhimani, Rohan, et al.. (2024). The utility of point-of-care dynamic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of subtle isolated ligamentous Lisfranc injuries: a cadaveric study. Skeletal Radiology. 54(3). 543–552. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ranganathan, Noopur, David Shin, Hamid Ghaednia, et al.. (2023). Using machine learning in the prediction of symptomatic venous thromboembolism following ankle fracture. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 30(2). 110–116. 5 indexed citations
8.
Ashkani‐Esfahani, Soheil, Rohan Bhimani, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs, et al.. (2022). Assessment of Ankle Fractures using Deep Learning Algorithms and Convolutional Neural Network. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics. 7(1). 5 indexed citations
9.
Rikken, Quinten G.H., et al.. (2022). Novel values in the radiographic diagnosis of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Injury. 53(6). 2326–2332. 8 indexed citations
10.
Hagemeijer, Noortje, Quinten G.H. Rikken, Jad S. Husseini, et al.. (2022). Lisfranc injury: Refined diagnostic methodology using weightbearing and non-weightbearing radiographs. Injury. 53(6). 2318–2325. 20 indexed citations
11.
Bejarano‐Pineda, Lorena, Daniel Guss, Gregory R. Waryasz, Christopher W. DiGiovanni, & John Y. Kwon. (2021). The Syndesmosis, Part I. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 52(4). 403–415. 14 indexed citations
12.
Bhimani, Rohan, Soheil Ashkani‐Esfahani, Bart Lubberts, et al.. (2021). Utility of WBCT to Diagnose Syndesmotic Instability in Patients With Weber B Lateral Malleolar Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 30(3). e423–e433. 4 indexed citations
13.
Hagemeijer, Noortje, et al.. (2021). Screw versus suture button in treatment of syndesmosis instability: Comparison using weightbearing CT scan. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 27(3). 285–290. 8 indexed citations
15.
Gianakos, Arianna L., et al.. (2020). Combination Lower Extremity Nerve Blocks and Their Effect on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 60(1). 121–131. 16 indexed citations
16.
Guss, Daniel, et al.. (2019). Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding Adverse Events in Lower Leg, Ankle, and Foot Orthopaedic Surgery with and without Anticoagulants. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 101(6). 539–546. 12 indexed citations
17.
Prince, Robert, et al.. (2018). Symptomatic venous thromboembolism after non‐operatively treated foot or ankle injury. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 37(1). 190–196. 5 indexed citations
18.
Guss, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Venous Thromboembolism Disease Prophylaxis in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 49(2). 265–276. 4 indexed citations
19.
Guss, Daniel, et al.. (2017). The effect of ankle distraction on arthroscopic evaluation of syndesmotic instability: A cadaveric study. Clinical Biomechanics. 50. 16–20. 12 indexed citations
20.
Ring, David, Daniel Guss, & Jesse B. Jupiter. (2012). Reconstruction of the Coronoid Process Using a Fragment of Discarded Radial Head. The Journal Of Hand Surgery. 37(3). 570–574. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026