Pierre-Gerlier Forest
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Julia AbelsonJohn EylesÉlisabeth MartinPatricia SmithChris McLeodPatricia CollinsAnn CasebeerGail MacKean
- Topics
- Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers)Healthcare Systems and Practices (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Pierre-Gerlier Forest
14 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- General Health Professions 498
- Sociology and Political Science 270
- Economics and Econometrics 235
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 129
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 110
Countries citing papers authored by Pierre-Gerlier Forest
This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre-Gerlier Forest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre-Gerlier Forest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre-Gerlier Forest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre-Gerlier Forest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre-Gerlier Forest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre-Gerlier Forest. The network helps show where Pierre-Gerlier Forest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pierre-Gerlier Forest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pierre-Gerlier Forest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pierre-Gerlier Forest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pierre-Gerlier Forest. Pierre-Gerlier Forest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processesbreakdown → | 701 |
| 15 | 118 | |
| 16 | 0 |
About Pierre-Gerlier Forest
Pierre-Gerlier Forest is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Urban Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (70 citations), General Health Professions (498 citations) and Communication (101 citations). Pierre-Gerlier Forest has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Julia Abelson, John Eyles, Élisabeth Martin, Patricia Smith, Chris McLeod, Patricia Collins, Ann Casebeer, Gail MacKean, Daniel J. Dutton and Jennifer Zwicker. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Health Affairs and Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.