Nathalie Clavel

1.0k total citations
18 papers, 552 citations indexed

About

Nathalie Clavel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathalie Clavel has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 552 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Health Information Management and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nathalie Clavel's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). Nathalie Clavel is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). Nathalie Clavel collaborates with scholars based in Canada, France and United Kingdom. Nathalie Clavel's co-authors include Marie‐Pascale Pomey, Philippe Karazivan, Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri, Vincent Dumez, Nicolás Fernández, Paule Lebel, Béatrice Débarges, Marie‐Claude Vanier, Emmanuelle Jouet and Louise Normandin and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Nathalie Clavel

16 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathalie Clavel Canada 10 402 126 60 54 49 18 552
Andrew J. Potter United States 12 223 0.6× 117 0.9× 89 1.5× 51 0.9× 39 0.8× 23 415
Claudio Del Grande Canada 10 371 0.9× 130 1.0× 69 1.1× 32 0.6× 67 1.4× 20 524
Christine Atwell United Kingdom 10 322 0.8× 120 1.0× 55 0.9× 36 0.7× 29 0.6× 13 488
Emmeline Ochiai United States 9 304 0.8× 90 0.7× 46 0.8× 43 0.8× 49 1.0× 13 547
Philippe Karazivan Canada 10 531 1.3× 236 1.9× 48 0.8× 60 1.1× 66 1.3× 21 755
Shaghayegh Vahdat Iran 5 248 0.6× 98 0.8× 33 0.6× 35 0.6× 30 0.6× 21 435
Emmanuelle Jouet France 8 440 1.1× 137 1.1× 37 0.6× 78 1.4× 47 1.0× 30 617
Leila Hamzehgardeshi Iran 4 280 0.7× 110 0.9× 26 0.4× 51 0.9× 31 0.6× 5 474
Shannon C. Wilson United States 6 297 0.7× 125 1.0× 29 0.5× 52 1.0× 35 0.7× 7 446
Laura Guzman-Corrales United States 8 296 0.7× 103 0.8× 36 0.6× 43 0.8× 39 0.8× 11 449

Countries citing papers authored by Nathalie Clavel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathalie Clavel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathalie Clavel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathalie Clavel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathalie Clavel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathalie Clavel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathalie Clavel. The network helps show where Nathalie Clavel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathalie Clavel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathalie Clavel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathalie Clavel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathalie Clavel. Nathalie Clavel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
2.
Clavel, Nathalie, Caroline Paquet, & Régis Blais. (2024). Facilitating the Implementation of Midwifery Services: The Case of Montérégie, Quebec. 14(2). 8–16. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, Nathalie Clavel, Louise Normandin, et al.. (2021). Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health‐care professionals: Co‐construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives. Health Expectations. 24(4). 1230–1241. 15 indexed citations
5.
Clavel, Nathalie, Vincent Dumez, Claudio Del Grande, et al.. (2021). Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience. Health Expectations. 24(6). 1924–1935. 35 indexed citations
6.
Clavel, Nathalie, et al.. (2021). Risk Perceptions, Knowledge and Behaviors of General and High-Risk Adult Populations Towards COVID-19: A Systematic Scoping Review. Public health reviews. 42. 1603979–1603979. 16 indexed citations
7.
Hudson, Émilie, Nathalie Clavel, Kelley Kilpatrick, & Mélanie Lavoie‐Tremblay. (2021). Effective online learning strategies for leadership and policy undergraduate courses for nursing students: a rapid review. Journal of Professional Nursing. 37(6). 1079–1085. 5 indexed citations
8.
Clavel, Nathalie & Marie‐Pascale Pomey. (2020). Clinical Governance to Enhance User Involvement in Care: A Canadian Multiple Case Study in Mental Health. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 11(5). 658–669. 4 indexed citations
9.
Clavel, Nathalie & Marie‐Pascale Pomey. (2020). Enhancing patient involvement in quality improvement: How complaint managers see their roles and limitations. Patient Experience Journal. 7(3). 112–118. 6 indexed citations
10.
Clavel, Nathalie, Marie‐Pascale Pomey, & Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri. (2019). Partnering with patients in quality improvement: towards renewed practices for healthcare organization managers?. BMC Health Services Research. 19(1). 815–815. 20 indexed citations
11.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, et al.. (2018). How patients view their contribution as partners in the enhancement of patient safety in clinical care. Patient Experience Journal. 5(1). 35–49. 8 indexed citations
12.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, et al.. (2018). Development of Patient-Inclusive Teams: Toward a Structured Methodology. Healthcare Quarterly. 21(SP). 38–44. 21 indexed citations
13.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, et al.. (2017). Wait time management strategies for total joint replacement surgery: sustainability and unintended consequences. BMC Health Services Research. 17(1). 629–629. 11 indexed citations
14.
Clavel, Nathalie, Carolyn De Coster, Marie‐Pascale Pomey, et al.. (2016). Appropriateness for Total Joint Replacement: Perspectives of Decision-Makers. Healthcare policy. 11(3). 80–92. 3 indexed citations
15.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, Philippe Karazivan, Vincent Dumez, et al.. (2015). [The Montreal model: the challenges of a partnership relationship between patients and healthcare professionals].. PubMed. 27(1 Suppl). S41–50. 71 indexed citations
16.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, Philippe Karazivan, Vincent Dumez, et al.. (2015). Le «  Montreal model  » : enjeux du partenariat relationnel entre patients et professionnels de la santé. Santé Publique. S1(HS). 41–50. 170 indexed citations
17.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri, Philippe Karazivan, Nicolás Fernández, & Nathalie Clavel. (2015). Patients as Partners: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ Engagement in Their Health Care. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0122499–e0122499. 144 indexed citations
18.
Pomey, Marie‐Pascale, Pierre-Gerlier Forest, Claudia Sanmartin, et al.. (2013). Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times. Implementation Science. 8(1). 61–61. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026