Piera Belluardo
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Giovanni A. FavaSilvana GrandiChiara RafanelliSandra ContiNicoletta SoninoMarco BoscaroElisa ManiChiara Ruini
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers)Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological MedicineActa Psychiatrica ScandinavicaProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Piera Belluardo
10 papers receiving 759 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 347
- Clinical Psychology 267
- Psychiatry and Mental health 204
- Pharmacology 178
- Reproductive Medicine 123
Countries citing papers authored by Piera Belluardo
This map shows the geographic impact of Piera Belluardo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piera Belluardo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piera Belluardo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Piera Belluardo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piera Belluardo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piera Belluardo. The network helps show where Piera Belluardo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Piera Belluardo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Piera Belluardo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Piera Belluardo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Piera Belluardo. Piera Belluardo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 | |
| 2 | 113 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 317 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 159 |
About Piera Belluardo
Piera Belluardo is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 10 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers) and Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (347 citations), Biological Psychiatry (39 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (123 citations). Piera Belluardo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni A. Fava, Silvana Grandi, Chiara Rafanelli, Sandra Conti, Nicoletta Sonino, Marco Boscaro, Elisa Mani, Chiara Ruini, Lara Mangelli and Giovanni A. Fava. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.