Pia Schlumberger

578 total citations
8 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

Pia Schlumberger is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Pia Schlumberger has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pharmacy, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Pia Schlumberger's work include Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). Pia Schlumberger is often cited by papers focused on Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). Pia Schlumberger collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. Pia Schlumberger's co-authors include Winfried Rief, Johannes Hebebrand, Matthias Conradt, Elisabeth Rauh, Anke Hinney, Patrick Tarnow, Caren Vollmert, Harald Brumm, Kathrin Reichwald and Peter Lichtner and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

In The Last Decade

Pia Schlumberger

8 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Pia Schlumberger Germany	7	164	118	109	103	75	8	411
Camden Elliott United States	8	458 2.8×	47 0.4×	92 0.8×	21 0.2×	41 0.5×	9	653
Cynthia M. Bulik United States	4	465 2.8×	37 0.3×	40 0.4×	12 0.1×	28 0.4×	10	528
S. R. Sunday United States	7	449 2.7×	20 0.2×	24 0.2×	21 0.2×	29 0.4×	8	539
Meagan M. Carr United States	12	281 1.7×	12 0.1×	45 0.4×	11 0.1×	65 0.9×	35	451
Maria Fernanda Laus Brazil	13	311 1.9×	7 0.1×	89 0.8×	43 0.4×	53 0.7×	39	483
Shengping Li China	10	68 0.4×	26 0.2×	4 0.0×	47 0.5×	30 0.4×	24	514
Anita Darby Australia	9	523 3.2×	17 0.1×	148 1.4×	9 0.1×	43 0.6×	10	593
James R. Falk United States	6	607 3.7×	31 0.3×	77 0.7×	19 0.2×	36 0.5×	6	684
Yasmina Silén Finland	7	370 2.3×	18 0.2×	24 0.2×	10 0.1×	21 0.3×	8	398
Susan E. Barker United States	12	301 1.8×	16 0.1×	37 0.3×	15 0.1×	18 0.2×	14	422

Countries citing papers authored by Pia Schlumberger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pia Schlumberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pia Schlumberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pia Schlumberger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pia Schlumberger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pia Schlumberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pia Schlumberger. The network helps show where Pia Schlumberger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pia Schlumberger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pia Schlumberger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pia Schlumberger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pia Schlumberger. Pia Schlumberger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Conradt, Matthias, et al.. (2008). Who copes well? Obesity‐related coping and its associations with shame, guilt, and weight loss. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 64(10). 1129–1144. 62 indexed citations

Hilbert, Anja, Matthias Conradt, Pia Schlumberger, et al.. (2008). Causal attributions of obese men and women in genetic testing: Implications of genetic/biological attributions1. Psychology and Health. 24(7). 749–761. 16 indexed citations

Conradt, Matthias, Pia Schlumberger, Elisabeth Rauh, et al.. (2008). A consultation with genetic information about obesity decreases self-blame about eating and leads to realistic weight loss goals in obese individuals. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 66(4). 287–295. 25 indexed citations

Rief, Winfried, Matthias Conradt, Elisabeth Rauh, et al.. (2007). Is Information on Genetic Determinants of Obesity Helpful or Harmful for Obese People?—A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 22(11). 1553–1559. 30 indexed citations

Conradt, Matthias, et al.. (2007). Development of the Weight- and Body-Related Shame and Guilt Scale (WEB–SG) in a Nonclinical Sample of Obese Individuals. Journal of Personality Assessment. 88(3). 317–327. 83 indexed citations

Hinney, Anke, Thomas Bettecken, Patrick Tarnow, et al.. (2006). Prevalence, Spectrum, and Functional Characterization of Melanocortin-4 Receptor Gene Mutations in a Representative Population-Based Sample and Obese Adults from Germany. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 91(5). 1761–1769. 147 indexed citations

Conradt, Matthias, Pia Schlumberger, Elisabeth Rauh, et al.. (2006). Genetische Aspekte in der Adipositas-Beratung – Auswirkungen auf Körperakzeptanz und subjektives Wohlbefinden. Verhaltenstherapie. 16(3). 193–200. 1 indexed citations

Conradt, Matthias, et al.. (2006). What determines well-being in obesity? Associations with BMI, social skills, and social support. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 60(3). 219–227. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact