Phoebe Williams

5.9k citations
98 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 23

Phoebe Williams

88 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Phoebe Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 108
  • Molecular Medicine 149
  • Virology 131
  • Infectious Diseases 490
  • Microbiology 140
Replace Muh‐Yong Yen with:
Muh‐Yong Yen Taiwan
Eric Chamot United States
Pritish K. Tosh United States
Giovanni Battista Orsi Italy
Alfred DeMaria United States
Merete Storgaard Denmark
Isabel Oliver United Kingdom
Karim Manji Tanzania
Kirsty Le Doaré United Kingdom
Michael Ohl United States
Phoebe Williams relative to Muh‐Yong Yen Taiwan Muh‐Yong Yen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Muh‐Yong Yen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe Williams. The network helps show where Phoebe Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phoebe Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phoebe Williams Line = papers co-authored together Phoebe Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20247
4 20240
5 20243
6 20249
7 20233
8 20235
9 202213
10 202113
11 201838
12 201815
13 201896
14 20157
15
An audit review of end-of-life care for inpatients with diabetes
20122
16 200911
17 198933
18
Anxiety levels of rooming-in and non-rooming-in parents of young hospitalized children.
19889
19
Portal hypertension in idiopathic tropical splenomegaly
19661
20 19569

About Phoebe Williams

Phoebe Williams is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Molecular Medicine and Microbiology, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (11 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (11 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (10 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (10 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (9 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (8 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (6 papers) and Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (108 citations), Molecular Medicine (149 citations) and Virology (131 citations). Phoebe Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include James A. Berkley, Adrian Mindel, David Isaacs, Haskell Wl, Stephen P. Fortmann, Michael Adler, C. Barr Taylor, A. Faherty, Nathan Maccoby and Richard S. Tedder. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections, The Lancet, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Journal of Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026