Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Co-authors
- Matthew McQuinnAnson D’AloisioSimeon BirdPaul R. ShapiroHy TracJessica K. WerkJarrett L. JohnsonG. Ghirlanda
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (9 papers)Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPhysical review. D
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck
13 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 280
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 123
- Instrumentation 54
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 20
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 14
Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck
This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck. The network helps show where Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck. Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 70 | |
| 13 | 5 |
About Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck
Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (9 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (280 citations), Instrumentation (54 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (123 citations). Phoebe R. Upton Sanderbeck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Matthew McQuinn, Anson D’Aloisio, Simeon Bird, Paul R. Shapiro, Hy Trac, Jessica K. Werk, Jarrett L. Johnson, G. Ghirlanda, Chris L. Fryer and Avery Meiksin. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.