Phillipa van Essen
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 1%
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Surgery
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Annabelle ChanEric HaanHeather ScottKevin PriestMichael J. DaviesVivienne MooreKristyn WillsonAlastair H. MacLennan
- Topics
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers)Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaObstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Phillipa van Essen
15 papers receiving 935 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 698
- Reproductive Medicine 364
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 241
- Surgery 123
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 103
Countries citing papers authored by Phillipa van Essen
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillipa van Essen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillipa van Essen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillipa van Essen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillipa van Essen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillipa van Essen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillipa van Essen. The network helps show where Phillipa van Essen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillipa van Essen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillipa van Essen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillipa van Essen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillipa van Essen. Phillipa van Essen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 81 | |
| 8 | Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defectsbreakdown → | 553 |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 87 |
About Phillipa van Essen
Phillipa van Essen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cancer Research, having authored 16 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (364 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (698 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (103 citations). Phillipa van Essen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Annabelle Chan, Eric Haan, Heather Scott, Kevin Priest, Michael J. Davies, Vivienne Moore, Kristyn Willson, Alastair H. MacLennan, Eva Strijbis and M. Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.