Phillip Williams

84 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Hit Papers

Direct Gene Transfer into Mouse Muscle in Vivo 1990 · 3.2k citations
3.2k199020262002201410002.0k3.0k

Peers

Phillip Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Genetics 1.7k
  • Immunology 1.2k
  • Molecular Biology 3.2k
  • Structural Biology 56
  • Biotechnology 337
Replace Robert J.C. Gilbert with:
Robert J.C. Gilbert United Kingdom
Robert L. Garcea United States
Niek N. Sanders Belgium
Philip J. Santangelo United States
Peixuan Guo United States
Jason Mercer United Kingdom
Paul Monaghan United Kingdom
Sanjay Tyagi United States
Christopher H. Contag United States
James F. Conway United States
Phillip Williams relative to Robert J.C. Gilbert United Kingdom Robert J.C. Gilbert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Robert J.C. Gilbert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Williams. The network helps show where Phillip Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip Williams Line = papers co-authored together Phillip Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20231
3 202314
4 20233
5 20229
6 20217
7 201918
8 201915
9 201313
10 20131
11 2012210
12
Redefining High-Performance Concrete Structures
20124
13
Introduction to Dolby Digital Plus, an Enhancement to the Dolby Digital Coding System
200413
14 2001120
15 199753
16 199576
17 199354
18 1992234
19 199120
20 1988157

About Phillip Williams

Phillip Williams is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Signal Processing, Cancer Research and Radiation, having authored 92 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (15 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (8 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (7 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (5 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.7k citations), Immunology (1.2k citations), Molecular Biology (3.2k citations), Structural Biology (56 citations) and Biotechnology (337 citations). Phillip Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jon A. Wolff, Chong Wang, Philip L. Felgner, Gyula Acsádi, Robert W. Malone, Ágnes Jáni, Martin E. Dowty, Guofeng Zhang, Shoushu Jiao and S. J. Papadakis. Their work appears in journals such as Human Gene Therapy, Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin, Surgery, Applied Physics Letters and The American Journal of Surgical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026