Phillip N. Smith

2.0k total citations
68 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Phillip N. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Phillip N. Smith has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 60 papers in Clinical Psychology, 27 papers in Social Psychology and 18 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Phillip N. Smith's work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (48 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (11 papers). Phillip N. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (48 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (11 papers). Phillip N. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Mexico. Phillip N. Smith's co-authors include Kelly C. Cukrowicz, Caitlin Wolford‐Clevenger, Erin K. Poindexter, Kimberly A. Van Orden, Jon T. Mandracchia, Ulrike Wintersberger, Joseph M. Currier, Valerie Hobson, Lee M. Cohen and Candice N. Selwyn and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Public Health, Clinical Psychology Review and European Journal of Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Phillip N. Smith

67 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Phillip N. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 525
  • Health 293
  • Sociology and Political Science 283
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 201
Replace Shyamala Nada‐Raja with:
Shyamala Nada‐Raja New Zealand
Louise Harriss United Kingdom
Amy M. Brausch United States
José Almenara Spain
Sarah Swannell Australia
AnnaBelle O. Bryan United States
Victoria Soto‐Sanz Spain
Andrea Miranda-Mendizábal Spain
Jianing You China
Nicole Heilbron United States
Shyamala Nada‐Raja New Zealand View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Phillip N. Smith
Phillip N. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Phillip N. Smith
Phillip N. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip N. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip N. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip N. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip N. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip N. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip N. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip N. Smith. The network helps show where Phillip N. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip N. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip N. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip N. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip N. Smith. Phillip N. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 1
4 2
5 3
6 10
7 5
8 67
9 18
10 9
11 12
12 24
13 22
14 25
15 61
16 97
17 51
18 11
19 124
20 11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026