Phillip M. Roberts

108 total papers · 1.5k total citations
79 papers, 996 citations indexed

About

Phillip M. Roberts is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Phillip M. Roberts has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 996 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Plant Science, 42 papers in Insect Science and 16 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Phillip M. Roberts's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (39 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (19 papers) and Research in Cotton Cultivation (18 papers). Phillip M. Roberts is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (39 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (19 papers) and Research in Cotton Cultivation (18 papers). Phillip M. Roberts collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Brazil. Phillip M. Roberts's co-authors include Jeremy K. Greene, Dominic Reisig, John L. Snider, Alana L. Jacobson, Michael D. Toews, Francis P. F. Reay‐Jones, Craig W. Bednarz, Sudeep Bag, J. S. Bacheler and A. Stanley Culpepper and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Plant Science.

In The Last Decade

Phillip M. Roberts

70 papers receiving 965 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Phillip M. Roberts 672 601 293 211 75 79 996
Eric T. Natwick 791 1.2× 605 1.0× 137 0.5× 181 0.9× 98 1.3× 79 1.0k
W. L. Parrott 689 1.0× 440 0.7× 356 1.2× 122 0.6× 20 0.3× 84 932
Richard B. Chalfant 545 0.8× 553 0.9× 233 0.8× 110 0.5× 18 0.2× 62 799
Rui Guo 400 0.6× 313 0.5× 188 0.6× 163 0.8× 62 0.8× 75 917
Marcelo Agenor Pavan 805 1.2× 506 0.8× 150 0.5× 50 0.2× 112 1.5× 86 1.0k
Jonathan R. Schultheis 915 1.4× 172 0.3× 178 0.6× 168 0.8× 23 0.3× 113 1.1k
R. L. Nichols 798 1.2× 224 0.4× 115 0.4× 62 0.3× 128 1.7× 42 919
Mario Porcel 367 0.5× 448 0.7× 145 0.5× 446 2.1× 32 0.4× 41 992
A. J. Caesar 765 1.1× 251 0.4× 114 0.4× 157 0.7× 16 0.2× 51 960
Charles G. Summers 595 0.9× 573 1.0× 85 0.3× 190 0.9× 17 0.2× 60 879

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip M. Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip M. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip M. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip M. Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip M. Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip M. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip M. Roberts. The network helps show where Phillip M. Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip M. Roberts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip M. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip M. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip M. Roberts. Phillip M. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026