Phillip G. Armour
- Information Systems top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Software top 5%
- Co-authors
- Simon HollandsPatrick ButtonRobert CharetteDavid A. FabryHal BerghelAchintya K. BhowmikJohn Leslie King
- Topics
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers)Software Engineering Research (4 papers)Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers)
- Journals
- Communications of the ACMComputerAEA Papers and Proceedings
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Phillip G. Armour
38 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Information Systems 187
- Management Information Systems 87
- Strategy and Management 64
- Computer Science Applications 64
- Software 61
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip G. Armour
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip G. Armour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip G. Armour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip G. Armour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip G. Armour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip G. Armour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip G. Armour. The network helps show where Phillip G. Armour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip G. Armour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip G. Armour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip G. Armour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip G. Armour. Phillip G. Armour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | Zeppelins and jet planes: a metaphor for modern software projects. | 1 |
| 16 | Software as Currency. | 2 |
| 17 | Matching Process to Types of Teams | 5 |
| 18 | The laws of software process. | 7 |
| 19 | The case for a new business model. | 7 |
| 20 | 42 |
About Phillip G. Armour
Phillip G. Armour is a scholar working on Software, Computer Science Applications and Management Information Systems, having authored 45 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (61 citations), Computer Science Applications (64 citations) and Management Information Systems (87 citations). Phillip G. Armour has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Simon Hollands, Patrick Button, Robert Charette, David A. Fabry, Hal Berghel, Achintya K. Bhowmik and John Leslie King. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Computer and AEA Papers and Proceedings.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.