Countries citing papers authored by Mo Adam Mahmood
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mo Adam Mahmood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mo Adam Mahmood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mo Adam Mahmood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mo Adam Mahmood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mo Adam Mahmood. The network helps show where Mo Adam Mahmood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mo Adam Mahmood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mo Adam Mahmood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mo Adam Mahmood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mo Adam Mahmood. Mo Adam Mahmood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bagchi, Kallol & Mo Adam Mahmood. (2004). A Longitudinal Study of a Business Model of On-line Shopping Behavior Using a Latent Growth Curve Approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 240.13 indexed citations
2.
Maçada, Antônio Carlos Gastaud, Mo Adam Mahmood, & João Luiz Becker. (2000). Development and validation of an instrument to evaluate the impact of information technology investments: a cross-country analysis. 893–894.2 indexed citations
Mahmood, Mo Adam, et al.. (1998). Measuring Information Technology Investment Payoff: Contemporary Approaches. Medical Entomology and Zoology.29 indexed citations
5.
Mahmood, Mo Adam. (1997). How information technology resources affect organizational performance and productivity. Information Resources Management Journal. 10(1). 4–5.4 indexed citations
Mahmood, Mo Adam, Erik Brynjolfsson, Vijay Gurbaxani, James D. McKeen, & Stephen S. Roach. (1994). Information Technology Productivity Paradox: The Problem Facing IT Managers and Researchers.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 478–480.
9.
Banker, Rajiv D., Robert J. Kauffman, & Mo Adam Mahmood. (1993). Strategic information technology management: Perspectives on organizational growth and competitive advantage. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University).92 indexed citations
10.
Banker, Rajiv D., Robert J. Kauffman, & Mo Adam Mahmood. (1993). Measuring the business value of IT: a future-oriented perspective. IGI Global eBooks. 595–605.3 indexed citations
Mahmood, Mo Adam, et al.. (1992). Evaluating a Technology Integration Causal Model for the K-12 Public School Curriculum: A LISREL Analysis..3 indexed citations
13.
Mahmood, Mo Adam. (1991). Differentiating organizational strategic performance using information technology investment measures: a cluster analysis approach. 133–142.1 indexed citations
14.
Mahmood, Mo Adam, et al.. (1989). Assessing the Effect of Computer Literacy on a Subject's Attitudes, Values, and Opinions toward Information Technology--An Exploratory Longitudinal Investigation Using the Linear Structural Relations (LISREL) Model.. The Journal of Computer Based Instruction. 16(1). 20–28.14 indexed citations
Mahmood, Mo Adam. (1987). System Development Methods - Comparative Investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(3). 3.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.