Phillip Day

622 citations
9 papers · 458 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Celiac Disease Research and Management 5
    • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 1
    • Eosinophilic Esophagitis 1

Phillip Day

9 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Phillip Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Gastroenterology 355
  • Immunology and Allergy 43
  • Epidemiology 240
  • Immunology 73
  • Biotechnology 26
Replace Lenka Palová Jelínková with:
Lenka Palová Jelínková Czechia
David H. Dewar United Kingdom
M Kontakou United Kingdom
Vikas K. Sarna Norway
Salvatore Auricchio Italy
Sandra Neidhöfer Israel
Martina Galatola Italy
Jos J France
Giuliana Lania Italy
Siri Dørum Norway
Phillip Day relative to Lenka Palová Jelínková Czechia Lenka Palová Jelínková's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Lenka Palová Jelínková · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Day. The network helps show where Phillip Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip Day Line = papers co-authored together Phillip Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1994203
2 199583
3 199561
4 200750
5 200819
6 199418
7 199417
8
19965
9
Asian Central Banks Consider Alternatives to Big Dollar Holdings
20042

About Phillip Day

Phillip Day is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Celiac Disease Research and Management (5 papers), Microscopic Colitis (3 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (355 citations), Immunology and Allergy (43 citations), Epidemiology (240 citations), Immunology (73 citations) and Biotechnology (26 citations). Phillip Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malawi and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Ciclitira, H J Ellis, Richard Sturgess, M Kontakou, Henrik Gjertsen, Knut E. A. Lundin, Robert Przemioslo, G. Astrid Limb, Fiona Salway and Ray Shidrawi. Their work appears in journals such as International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, Gut, The Lancet, International Journal of Epidemiology and Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact