Philipp Fuchs

29 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers

Philipp Fuchs
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 182
  • Ophthalmology 78
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 192
  • Radiation 52
  • Condensed Matter Physics 43
Replace Ricardo Alarcón with:
Ricardo Alarcón United States
T. Kämpfer Germany
C. Agodi Italy
M. De Napoli Italy
D. Wegener Germany
G. Løvhøiden Norway
Georgy A. Kazakov Austria
Kaikai Zhang China
W.W. Buck United States
A. N. Otte United States
Philipp Fuchs relative to Ricardo Alarcón United States Ricardo Alarcón's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.1×
Ricardo Alarcón · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Fuchs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Fuchs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Fuchs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Fuchs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Fuchs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Fuchs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Fuchs. The network helps show where Philipp Fuchs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Fuchs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Fuchs Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Fuchs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201977
2 198265
3 198164
4 202235
5 198130
6 198126
7 202318
8 202314
9 202214
10 202313
11 202412
12 201612
13 20239
14 20248
15 20137
16 20246
17 19906
18 20245
19 20224
20 20234

About Philipp Fuchs

Philipp Fuchs is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (12 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (9 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (6 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (6 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (5 papers), Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (4 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (182 citations), Ophthalmology (78 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (192 citations), Radiation (52 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (43 citations). Philipp Fuchs has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include H. Emling, D. Schwalm, E. Grosse, H. J. Wollersheim, Christoph Becher, Ursula Schmidt‐Erfurth, Gregor S. Reiter, Johannes Görlitz, Takashi Taniguchi and Takayuki Iwasaki. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, The European Physical Journal A and Ophthalmology Retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact