Philip Young

111 total papers · 682 total citations
41 papers, 431 citations indexed

About

Philip Young is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Young has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 431 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 7 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Philip Young's work include American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers). Philip Young is often cited by papers focused on American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers). Philip Young collaborates with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Philip Young's co-authors include Oliver W. Jones, Robert Murray Davis, Ernest Hemingway, Howard L. Judd, Samuel S.C. Yen, Joseph F. Kennedy, Joseph J. Barlow, James E. Egan, Zhigang Zhou and Kurt A. Zimmerman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Philip Young

32 papers receiving 342 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Young 122 80 68 59 51 41 431
Deborah Turner 10 0.1× 103 1.3× 17 0.3× 112 1.9× 94 1.8× 29 442
Jeffrey Stern 49 0.4× 65 0.8× 4 0.1× 64 1.1× 47 0.9× 35 412
Xiaoduan Chen 50 0.4× 86 1.1× 5 0.1× 121 2.1× 35 0.7× 40 419
J. Blake Scott 40 0.3× 3 0.0× 87 1.3× 33 0.6× 91 1.8× 30 441
Jessica Mason 58 0.5× 21 0.3× 52 0.8× 10 0.2× 9 0.2× 22 375
Elizabeth Stephens 47 0.4× 3 0.0× 15 0.2× 5 0.1× 31 0.6× 46 484
Chloe Parton 97 0.8× 110 1.4× 56 0.9× 33 0.6× 26 464
Ian Brown 31 0.3× 52 0.7× 29 0.4× 10 0.2× 50 387
Carl T. Javert 64 0.5× 211 2.6× 2 0.0× 233 3.9× 81 1.6× 26 478
S. Sinan Ozalp 116 1.0× 61 0.8× 4 0.1× 33 0.6× 89 1.7× 19 370

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Young. The network helps show where Philip Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Young. Philip Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026