Philip Thomas

2.2k citations
56 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Thomas

55 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Philip Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Transplantation 166
  • Reproductive Medicine 505
  • Equine 68
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 219
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 566
Replace Mitsuhiro Takagi with:
Mitsuhiro Takagi Japan
R. Petzoldt Germany
Raymond W. Wright United States
Michiko Noguchi Japan
Marie‐Odile Benoit‐Biancamano Canada
John V. Stokes United States
Susana Astiz Spain
Isabel Barranco Spain
Li‐Chun Ho Taiwan
Éva Mikó Hungary
Philip Thomas relative to Mitsuhiro Takagi Japan Mitsuhiro Takagi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33.2×
Mitsuhiro Takagi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Thomas. The network helps show where Philip Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Philip Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201836
2 20185
3 20184
4 201383
5 201046
6 20094
7 200758
8 200421
9
[Neoadjuvant therapy in advanced carcinoma of the esophagus: prognostic value of the histopathological response].
19981
10 199716
11 199714
12 199612
13 199534
14 199523
15 199499
16 199432
17 199479
18
Infertility in the bitch with abnormal oestrous cyclicity
19931
19
Infertility in the bitch with normal oestrous cycles
19931
20 199046

About Philip Thomas

Philip Thomas is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Transplantation, Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Equine, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (18 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (14 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (8 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (166 citations), Reproductive Medicine (505 citations), Equine (68 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (219 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (566 citations). Philip Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Barry A. Ball, Steven P. Brinsko, Ina Dobrinski, George G. Ignotz, Paula G. Miller, A K Kain, J.E. Ellington, W. B. Currie, Louise L. Southwood and Smita Vaidya. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Theriogenology, Biology of Reproduction, Transplantation and Contraception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026