Philip Taylor
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Chiaki KobayashiA. P. BeardmoreA. J. NortonChristoph FederrathP. GillM. W. RobertsWayne A. RubeyIlya Mandel
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (15 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (11 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPhysical Review A
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
Philip Taylor
29 papers receiving 518 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 427
- Instrumentation 120
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 67
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 55
- Computational Mechanics 30
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Taylor
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Taylor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Taylor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Taylor. The network helps show where Philip Taylor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Taylor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Taylor. Philip Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 78 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | Polyvinylidene fluoride molecules in nanofibers, imaged at atomic scale by aberration corrected electron microscopy | 1 |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Philip Taylor
Philip Taylor is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 30 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (15 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (11 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (120 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (427 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (55 citations). Philip Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chiaki Kobayashi, A. P. Beardmore, A. J. Norton, Christoph Federrath, P. Gill, M. W. Roberts, Wayne A. Rubey, Ilya Mandel, Takashi J. Moriya and S. E. de Mink. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physical Review A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.