Philip Stott
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sian SullivanPeter D. MooreC. Barry CoxMichael R. DoveThomas R. ValePeter A. FurleyJonathan ProctorJ. A. Ratter
- Topics
- African Botany and Ecology Studies (5 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- NatureSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Ecology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip Stott
35 papers receiving 688 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Global and Planetary Change 311
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 263
- Ecology 193
- Sociology and Political Science 141
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 116
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Stott
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Stott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Stott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Stott. The network helps show where Philip Stott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Stott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Stott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Stott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Stott. Philip Stott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Royal Siamese maps : war and trade in nineteenth century Thailand | 7 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | Tropical Rain Forest: A Political Ecology of Hegemonic myth making | 10 |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 51 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Philip Stott
Philip Stott is a scholar working on Forestry, Anthropology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 38 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African Botany and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (263 citations), Global and Planetary Change (311 citations) and Forestry (52 citations). Philip Stott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sian Sullivan, Peter D. Moore, C. Barry Cox, Michael R. Dove, Thomas R. Vale, Peter A. Furley, Jonathan Proctor, J. A. Ratter, Patricia A. Werner and Sandra Sacre. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.