Philip Sheldrake
Impact in
- Religious studies top 5%
- Christian Theology and Mission
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
-
- Religious Tourism and Spaces
Papers in
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 4
- Religion, Society, and Development 4
- Theological Perspectives and Practices 2
- Health 9
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 9
- Journals
- Religion and Theology (1 paper)Literature and Theology (1 paper)Horizons (1 paper)Spiritus (5 papers)Practical Theology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip Sheldrake
22 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Religious studies 41
- Geography, Planning and Development 44
- Health 65
- Sociology and Political Science 112
- Philosophy 27
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Sheldrake
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Sheldrake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Sheldrake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Sheldrake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Sheldrake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Sheldrake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Sheldrake. The network helps show where Philip Sheldrake may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spirituality and History: Questions of Interpretation and Method | 1991 | 46 |
| 2 | 2001 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 4 | Spirituality and theology: Christian living and the doctrine of God | 1999 | 17 |
| 5 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 9 | Spirituality and Theology | 1998 | 7 |
| 10 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 12 | The Business of Influence: Reframing Marketing and PR for the Digital Age | 2011 | 5 |
| 13 | The role of spiritual direction in the context of theological education | 1998 | 4 |
| 14 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 17 | Unending desire : De Certeau's 'mystics'. | 2001 | 2 |
| 18 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 20 | The Spiritual City: Theology, Spirituality, and the Urban | 2014 | 2 |
About Philip Sheldrake
Philip Sheldrake is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Geography, Planning and Development, Religious studies and Classics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (9 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (6 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers) and Theological Perspectives and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (41 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (44 citations), Health (65 citations), Sociology and Political Science (112 citations) and Philosophy (27 citations). Philip Sheldrake has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as Religion and Theology, Literature and Theology, Horizons, Spiritus and Practical Theology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.