Practical Theology
- Fields
- Religious studies (164 papers)Health (142 papers)Sociology and Political Science (317 papers)
- Topics
- Religion, Society, and DevelopmentReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyTheological Perspectives and Practices
In The Last Decade
Practical Theology
320 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Sociology and Political Science 839
- Health 511
- Religious studies 324
- Clinical Psychology 270
- Education 231
Countries where authors publish in Practical Theology
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Practical Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Practical Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical Theology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Practical Theology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Practical Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Practical Theology.
About Practical Theology
The 517 papers published in Practical Theology in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Practical Theology usually cover Religious studies (164 papers), Health (142 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (317 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Society, and Development (173 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (138 papers) and Theological Perspectives and Practices (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Practical Theology are Steve Nolan, Leslie J. Francis, Susannah Cornwall, Mandy Robbins, Robert E. Beamish, R.R. Ganzevoort, Graeme Smith, Elaine Graham, Andrew Village and Andrew Parker.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.