Philip Scranton

91 papers receiving 919 citations

Peers

Philip Scranton
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Sociology and Political Science 428
  • Economics and Econometrics 314
  • Political Science and International Relations 166
  • Strategy and Management 163
  • Marketing 154
Replace Simon Ville with:
Simon Ville Australia
Lucien Karpik France
Jonathon Mote United States
Timothy J. Dowd United States
Stephanie Decker United Kingdom
Franck Cochoy France
Naomi Klein United States
Edward C. Kirkland United States
Koray Çalışkan United States
David Gartman United States
Philip Scranton relative to Simon Ville Australia Simon Ville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Simon Ville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Scranton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Scranton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Scranton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Scranton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Scranton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Scranton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Scranton. The network helps show where Philip Scranton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Scranton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Scranton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Scranton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Scranton. Philip Scranton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4
Diversified Industrialization and Economic Success: Understanding Cincinnati’s Manufacturing Development, 1850–1925
0
5 25
6 1
7 0
8 1
9 1
10
The business of tourism : place, faith, and history
12
11
Industrializing Organisms: Introducing Evolutionary History
85
12 1
13 2
14
Conceptualizing Pennsylvania's Industrializations, 1850-1950
1
15 1
16 1
17 1
18
Large Firms and Industrial Restructuring: The Philadelphia Region, 1900-1980
1
19 9
20
An Immigrant Family & Industrial Enterprise: Sevill Schofield & The Philadelphia Textile Manufacture, 1845-1900
1

About Philip Scranton

Philip Scranton is a scholar working on Museology, History and Philosophy of Science and Marketing, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (17 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (13 papers) and American Environmental and Regional History (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (41 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (109 citations) and Public Administration (69 citations). Philip Scranton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ava Baron, Susan R. Schrepfer, Alfred D. Chandler, Warren Belasco, William G. Roy, Gregory H. Nobles, Nathan Miller, Robert Fox, Robert Kanigel and Michael Gibbert. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review and Industrial and Labor Relations Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026