Philip Roetman

606 total citations
24 papers, 436 citations indexed

About

Philip Roetman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Ecological Modeling and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Roetman has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 436 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 8 papers in Ecological Modeling and 5 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Philip Roetman's work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (7 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (5 papers). Philip Roetman is often cited by papers focused on Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (7 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (5 papers). Philip Roetman collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Philip Roetman's co-authors include James Ward, Carla Litchfield, Georgia Pollard, Christopher B. Daniels, Belinda Chiera, Ana M. M. Sequeira, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Jillian Dorrian, David Lloyd and Kathryn Paige and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Philip Roetman

24 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Roetman Australia 11 138 130 126 97 85 24 436
Mariano R. Recio New Zealand 15 144 1.0× 477 3.7× 157 1.2× 66 0.7× 49 0.6× 39 699
Tanja M. Straka Germany 16 96 0.7× 233 1.8× 64 0.5× 110 1.1× 56 0.7× 41 574
Eric G. Strauss United States 13 32 0.2× 197 1.5× 158 1.3× 57 0.6× 51 0.6× 32 568
Dara M. Wald United States 13 70 0.5× 115 0.9× 127 1.0× 95 1.0× 26 0.3× 32 481
Ugo Arbieu Germany 13 50 0.4× 183 1.4× 87 0.7× 115 1.2× 22 0.3× 26 473
Dídac Santos‐Fita Mexico 13 43 0.3× 213 1.6× 80 0.6× 220 2.3× 82 1.0× 36 548
Agnieszka Olszańska Poland 11 66 0.5× 284 2.2× 57 0.5× 65 0.7× 26 0.3× 16 470
Alia M. Dietsch United States 14 76 0.6× 395 3.0× 138 1.1× 235 2.4× 39 0.5× 33 795
J. Cristóbal Pizarro Chile 9 84 0.6× 196 1.5× 44 0.3× 91 0.9× 27 0.3× 18 453
Vasileios J. Kontsiotis Greece 12 94 0.7× 286 2.2× 91 0.7× 213 2.2× 16 0.2× 38 487

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Roetman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Roetman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Roetman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Roetman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Roetman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Roetman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Roetman. The network helps show where Philip Roetman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Roetman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Roetman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Roetman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Roetman. Philip Roetman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roetman, Philip, et al.. (2021). Investigating Attitudes Toward Sharks in Australia. Anthrozoös. 35(2). 323–334. 2 indexed citations
2.
Armstrong, Kyle N., et al.. (2021). Citizen science implements the first intensive acoustics-based survey of insectivorous bat species across the Murray–Darling Basin of South Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology. 68(6). 364–381. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kays, Roland, Robert R. Dunn, Arielle W. Parsons, et al.. (2020). The small home ranges and large local ecological impacts of pet cats. Animal Conservation. 23(5). 516–523. 56 indexed citations
4.
Roetman, Philip, et al.. (2020). Koala Counter: Recording Citizen Scientists’ search paths to Improve Data Quality. Global Ecology and Conservation. 24. e01376–e01376. 5 indexed citations
6.
Roetman, Philip, et al.. (2019). An analysis of Australian news and current affair program coverage of sharks on Facebook. Conservation Science and Practice. 1(11). 21 indexed citations
7.
Roetman, Philip, et al.. (2018). Management of Pet Cats: The Impact of the Cat Tracker Citizen Science Project in South Australia. Animals. 8(11). 190–190. 26 indexed citations
8.
Paige, Kathryn, David Lloyd, David Caldwell, et al.. (2018). Futures in primary science education – connecting students to place and ecojustice. UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia). 5 indexed citations
9.
Pollard, Georgia, James Ward, & Philip Roetman. (2018). Typically Diverse: The Nature of Urban Agriculture in South Australia. Sustainability. 10(4). 945–945. 20 indexed citations
10.
Pollard, Georgia, Philip Roetman, James Ward, Belinda Chiera, & Evangeline Mantzioris. (2018). Beyond Productivity: Considering the Health, Social Value and Happiness of Home and Community Food Gardens. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(4). 97–97. 28 indexed citations
11.
Pollard, Georgia, Philip Roetman, & James Ward. (2017). The case for citizen science in urban agriculture research. Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel). 5(3). 9–20. 18 indexed citations
12.
Litchfield, Carla, et al.. (2017). The ‘Feline Five’: An exploration of personality in pet cats (Felis catus). PLoS ONE. 12(8). e0183455–e0183455. 43 indexed citations
13.
Storksdieck, Martin, Jennifer Shirk, Jessica L. Cappadonna, et al.. (2016). Associations for Citizen Science: Regional Knowledge, Global Collaboration. Citizen Science Theory and Practice. 1(2). 10–10. 46 indexed citations
14.
Pecl, GT, et al.. (2015). Building Australia through citizen science. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 8 indexed citations
15.
Sequeira, Ana M. M., et al.. (2014). Distribution models for koalas in South Australia using citizen science‐collected data. Ecology and Evolution. 4(11). 2103–2114. 52 indexed citations
16.
Paige, Kathryn, et al.. (2014). RESEARCHING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SCIENCE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMME USING A PROPOSED CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS: A CASE STUDY. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 14(1). 149–175. 9 indexed citations
17.
Roetman, Philip, et al.. (2014). Citizen science for policy development: The case of koala management in South Australia. Environmental Science & Policy. 47. 126–136. 26 indexed citations
18.
Paige, Kathryn, et al.. (2012). Connecting Teachers and Students to the Natural World through "Operation Spider": An Aspirations Citizen Science Project.. Teaching science (Deakin West, A.C.T. : Online)/Teaching science. 58(1). 15–22. 8 indexed citations
19.
Paige, Kathryn, et al.. (2012). ‘Operation Magpie’: Inspiring Teachers' Professional Learning Through Environmental Science. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. 28(1). 27–41. 8 indexed citations
20.
Paige, Kathryn, et al.. (2010). "It Felt like Real Science!" How Operation Magpie Enriched My Classroom.. Teaching science (Deakin West, A.C.T. : Online)/Teaching science. 56(4). 25–33. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026