Philip Reeder

61 total papers · 509 total citations
30 papers, 328 citations indexed

About

Philip Reeder is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Space and Planetary Science and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Reeder has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 328 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ocean Engineering, 9 papers in Space and Planetary Science and 6 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Philip Reeder's work include Geophysical Methods and Applications (12 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (9 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers). Philip Reeder is often cited by papers focused on Geophysical Methods and Applications (12 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (9 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers). Philip Reeder collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Philip Reeder's co-authors include R. Lawrence Edwards, George A. Brook, L. Bruce Railsback, Hai Cheng, Jason Polk, Clark Alexander, Philip E. van Beynen, Daanish Mustafa, Robert Brinkmann and Grant L. Harley and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Environmental Management and Geophysics.

In The Last Decade

Philip Reeder

28 papers receiving 309 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Philip Reeder	159	138	64	62	59	30	328
Gerd Schukraft	145 0.9×	101 0.7×	65 1.0×	40 0.6×	33 0.6×	17	298
G. William Monaghan	141 0.9×	136 1.0×	48 0.8×	68 1.1×	77 1.3×	35	287
Morten Fischer Mortensen	170 1.1×	120 0.9×	35 0.5×	58 0.9×	129 2.2×	28	287
Jacek Szmańda	110 0.7×	40 0.3×	54 0.8×	131 2.1×	26 0.4×	38	357
Chris Nicholson	66 0.4×	157 1.1×	40 0.6×	36 0.6×	113 1.9×	45	354
Marcel Bakker	199 1.3×	53 0.4×	120 1.9×	88 1.4×	37 0.6×	19	334
Chester B. DePratter	59 0.4×	178 1.3×	22 0.3×	46 0.7×	206 3.5×	45	353
Valentina Flores‐Aqueveque	151 0.9×	74 0.5×	72 1.1×	39 0.6×	63 1.1×	38	307
Marjorie Sullivan	112 0.7×	157 1.1×	40 0.6×	58 0.9×	163 2.8×	39	326
Fernando X. Pereyra	57 0.4×	112 0.8×	30 0.5×	63 1.0×	104 1.8×	31	329

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Reeder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Reeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Reeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Reeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Reeder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Reeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Reeder. The network helps show where Philip Reeder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Reeder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Reeder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Reeder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Reeder. Philip Reeder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact