Philip Owen

1.6k total citations
33 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Philip Owen is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Owen has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Philip Owen's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (14 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (14 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (8 papers). Philip Owen is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (14 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (14 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (8 papers). Philip Owen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Philip Owen's co-authors include Khalid S. Khan, Thomas J. Farrell, Patrick Chien, Simon Ogston, Ian D. Duncan, Naren Patel, A.D. Christie, Peter Howie, Fiona Mackenzie and Alan W. Baird and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Obstetrics and Gynecology and British Journal of Haematology.

In The Last Decade

Philip Owen

33 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Owen United Kingdom 17 711 602 279 260 118 33 1.0k
J. W. Dudenhausen Germany 14 419 0.6× 376 0.6× 237 0.8× 109 0.4× 74 0.6× 47 710
Şevki Çelen Türkiye 15 426 0.6× 412 0.7× 333 1.2× 159 0.6× 38 0.3× 106 827
Sarah Običan United States 15 258 0.4× 314 0.5× 256 0.9× 129 0.5× 139 1.2× 53 754
Atalay Ekin Türkiye 17 321 0.5× 286 0.5× 215 0.8× 150 0.6× 65 0.6× 79 735
Maria Hohlagschwandtner Austria 14 250 0.4× 173 0.3× 188 0.7× 136 0.5× 107 0.9× 22 595
Shigeru Aoki Japan 15 625 0.9× 392 0.7× 295 1.1× 86 0.3× 41 0.3× 97 924
G. P. Mandruzzato Italy 14 353 0.5× 575 1.0× 164 0.6× 252 1.0× 166 1.4× 33 893
G. Beucher France 17 728 1.0× 551 0.9× 364 1.3× 112 0.4× 63 0.5× 58 997
Masamitsu Nakamura Japan 22 850 1.2× 844 1.4× 261 0.9× 73 0.3× 86 0.7× 79 1.2k
Marilisa Biolcati Italy 21 813 1.1× 701 1.2× 625 2.2× 56 0.2× 120 1.0× 33 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Owen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Owen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Owen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Owen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Owen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Owen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Owen. The network helps show where Philip Owen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Owen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Owen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Owen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Owen. Philip Owen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Norman, Jane E., Fiona Mackenzie, Philip Owen, et al.. (2009). Progesterone for the Prevention of Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancy (STOPPIT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study and Meta-Analysis. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 64(10). 646–648. 3 indexed citations
3.
Nelson, Scott M., et al.. (2007). First and third trimester ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 138(1). 34–38. 33 indexed citations
4.
Farrell, Thomas J., Philip Owen, D Kernaghan, et al.. (2006). Can ultrasound fetal biometry predict fetal hyperinsulinaemia at delivery in pregnancy complicated by maternal diabetes?. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 131(2). 146–150. 2 indexed citations
5.
Owen, Philip, et al.. (2005). The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in modern gynaecology. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 66(10). 574–577. 2 indexed citations
6.
Owen, Philip, et al.. (2005). Documentation of preoperative counselling for female sterilisation: a complete audit cycle. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 31(1). 24–25. 4 indexed citations
7.
Howatson, Allan G., et al.. (2004). Unadjusted and customised weight centiles in the identification of growth restriction among stillborn infants. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 111(12). 1460–1463. 10 indexed citations
8.
Brechin, Susan & Philip Owen. (2003). Management of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Hospital Medicine. 64(6). 348–351. 2 indexed citations
9.
Ferguson, Evelyn & Philip Owen. (2003). The second stage of labour. Hospital Medicine. 64(4). 210–213. 2 indexed citations
10.
Owen, Philip, et al.. (2002). LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY AND THE LAW. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 4(3). 183–183. 2 indexed citations
11.
Owen, Philip, et al.. (2002). Relationship between customised birthweight centiles and neonatal anthropometric features of growth restriction. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 109(6). 658–662. 34 indexed citations
12.
Owen, Philip. (2001). Interval between fetal measurements in predicting growth restriction. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 97(4). 499–504. 19 indexed citations
13.
Chien, Patrick, et al.. (2000). How useful is uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death? An overview. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 107(2). 196–208. 199 indexed citations
14.
Owen, Philip & Khalid S. Khan. (1998). Fetal growth velocity in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation in a low risk population. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 105(5). 536–540. 37 indexed citations
15.
Chien, Patrick, Khalid S. Khan, Simon Ogston, & Philip Owen. (1997). The diagnostic accuracy of cervico‐vaginal fetal fibronectin in predicting preterm delivery: an overviev. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 104(4). 436–444. 57 indexed citations
16.
Owen, Philip & Simon Ogston. (1997). Standards for the quantification of serial changes in Doppler resistance indices from the umbilical arteries. Early Human Development. 49(1). 39–47. 8 indexed citations
17.
Owen, Philip, et al.. (1996). Standards for ultrasound fetal growth velocity. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 103(1). 60–69. 109 indexed citations
18.
Owen, Philip, Gary Mires, & A.D. Christie. (1996). Impaired fetal growth velocity in the presence of notched uterine artery velocity waveforms. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 103(12). 1247–1249. 6 indexed citations
19.
Owen, Philip & Naren Patel. (1995). 5 Prevention of preterm birth. Baillière s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 9(3). 465–479. 7 indexed citations
20.
Owen, Philip, Thomas J. Farrell, & Wilhelm Steyn. (1995). Umbilical cord blood gas analysis; a comparison of two simple methods of sample storage. Early Human Development. 42(1). 67–71. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026