Philip M. Singer
- Condensed Matter Physics top 2%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Mechanics of Materials top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Takashi ImaiA. W. HuntGeorge J. HirasakiKent R. ThurberWalter G. ChapmanD. AsthagiriZeliang ChenH. Alloul
- Topics
- NMR spectroscopy and applications (36 papers)Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (27 papers)Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (15 papers)
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsNuclear and High Energy PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Singer
64 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Condensed Matter Physics 684
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 448
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 415
- Mechanics of Materials 372
- Materials Chemistry 308
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Singer
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Singer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Singer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Singer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Singer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Singer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Singer. The network helps show where Philip M. Singer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Singer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Singer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Singer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Singer. Philip M. Singer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | Fluid Typing and Pore Size in Organic Shale Using 2D NMR in Saturated Kerogen Isolates | 35 |
| 20 | NMR Relaxometry in Shale and Implications for Logging | 68 |
About Philip M. Singer
Philip M. Singer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include NMR spectroscopy and applications (36 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (27 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (684 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (415 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (448 citations). Philip M. Singer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Takashi Imai, A. W. Hunt, George J. Hirasaki, Kent R. Thurber, Walter G. Chapman, D. Asthagiri, Zeliang Chen, H. Alloul, Ferenc Simon and H. Kuzmany. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.