Philip Lee Williams
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- E. Paul HolmesPatrick W. CorriganChris LloydGeoff WaghornGeoffrey WaghornShirley MorrisseySamson TseJulaine Allan
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers)Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (5 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSchizophrenia BulletinPsychiatry Research
In The Last Decade
Philip Lee Williams
20 papers receiving 652 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Social Psychology 385
- Clinical Psychology 354
- General Health Professions 274
- Psychiatry and Mental health 136
- Sociology and Political Science 106
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Lee Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Lee Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Lee Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Lee Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Lee Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Lee Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Lee Williams. The network helps show where Philip Lee Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Lee Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Lee Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Lee Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Lee Williams. Philip Lee Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | A process for developing a student led programme in an acute mental health setting | 3 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 76 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | A Sexual Health Programme Implemented in a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit | 2 |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 423 |
About Philip Lee Williams
Philip Lee Williams is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Speech and Hearing, having authored 20 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (5 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (385 citations), Occupational Therapy (71 citations) and Clinical Psychology (354 citations). Philip Lee Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include E. Paul Holmes, Patrick W. Corrigan, Chris Lloyd, Geoff Waghorn, Chris Lloyd, Geoffrey Waghorn, Shirley Morrissey, Samson Tse, Julaine Allan and Dominique de Andrade. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.