John O’Gorman

2.1k total citations
91 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

John O’Gorman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John O’Gorman has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Clinical Psychology, 27 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 21 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John O’Gorman's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (13 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers). John O’Gorman is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (13 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers). John O’Gorman collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. John O’Gorman's co-authors include Diego De Leo, David Shum, Jurgita Rimkevičienė, Jacinta Hawgood, Raymond C. K. Chan, David A.T. Siddle, Jia Huang, Ting Xu, Yi Wang and Regan Potangaroa and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

John O’Gorman

87 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John O’Gorman Australia 22 590 469 430 346 204 91 1.5k
Ethan E. Gorenstein United States 17 864 1.5× 374 0.8× 296 0.7× 464 1.3× 239 1.2× 28 1.6k
Kirsten M. Poehlmann United States 12 270 0.5× 349 0.7× 489 1.1× 418 1.2× 151 0.7× 19 1.5k
Benjamin M. Dykman United States 16 558 0.9× 246 0.5× 435 1.0× 617 1.8× 170 0.8× 26 1.3k
David Schuldberg United States 22 504 0.9× 287 0.6× 279 0.6× 436 1.3× 108 0.5× 68 1.3k
Mathieu d’Acremont Switzerland 20 795 1.3× 486 1.0× 222 0.5× 548 1.6× 309 1.5× 23 1.7k
Aristide Saggino Italy 25 627 1.1× 266 0.6× 357 0.8× 503 1.5× 161 0.8× 74 1.5k
Hugh Wagner United Kingdom 20 531 0.9× 363 0.8× 608 1.4× 498 1.4× 215 1.1× 36 1.5k
Sarah Fogarty Australia 16 459 0.8× 391 0.8× 265 0.6× 398 1.2× 126 0.6× 48 1.2k
Carl‐Walter Kohlmann Germany 16 788 1.3× 262 0.6× 518 1.2× 448 1.3× 211 1.0× 53 1.7k
Livia Tomova United Kingdom 13 675 1.1× 384 0.8× 501 1.2× 273 0.8× 264 1.3× 19 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by John O’Gorman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John O’Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O’Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O’Gorman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John O’Gorman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O’Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O’Gorman. The network helps show where John O’Gorman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John O’Gorman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John O’Gorman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John O’Gorman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John O’Gorman. John O’Gorman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hawgood, Jacinta, et al.. (2023). The Role of Impulsivity and Self-Control in Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempt. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(6). 5012–5012. 11 indexed citations
2.
Hawgood, Jacinta, et al.. (2023). The Personal Suicide Stigma Questionnaire (PSSQ): Relation to Self-Esteem, Well-Being, and Help-Seeking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(5). 3816–3816. 6 indexed citations
3.
Fowler, Jane, et al.. (2021). Counselling Skills and Competencies Tool: Scale Development and Preliminary Data. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(2). 1 indexed citations
4.
Rimkevičienė, Jurgita, John O’Gorman, Jacinta Hawgood, & Diego De Leo. (2019). Development and Validity of the Personal Suicide Stigma Questionnaire (PSSQ). Crisis. 40(5). 317–325. 12 indexed citations
5.
Casey, Leanne M., et al.. (2016). Self-injury in young people and the help-negation effect. Psychiatry Research. 250. 291–296. 12 indexed citations
6.
O’Gorman, John, et al.. (2016). ADHD subtypes and neuropsychological performance in an adult sample. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 55. 55–63. 21 indexed citations
7.
Rimkevičienė, Jurgita, John O’Gorman, Jacinta Hawgood, & Diego De Leo. (2016). Timelines for difficult times: use of visual timelines in interviewing suicide attempters. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 13(3). 231–245. 9 indexed citations
8.
Rimkevičienė, Jurgita, Jacinta Hawgood, John O’Gorman, & Diego De Leo. (2015). Personal Stigma in Suicide Attempters. Death Studies. 39(10). 592–599. 63 indexed citations
9.
Wang, Ya, John O’Gorman, Chris Lloyd, et al.. (2015). Forming implementation intentions improves prospective memory in early psychosis. Psychiatry Research. 228(3). 265–271. 11 indexed citations
10.
Neulinger, Kerryn, et al.. (2015). Prospective memory and frontal lobe function. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 23(2). 171–183. 17 indexed citations
11.
Rimkevičienė, Jurgita, Jacinta Hawgood, John O’Gorman, & Diego De Leo. (2015). Assessment of acquired capability for suicide in clinical practice. Psychology Health & Medicine. 21(8). 954–963. 21 indexed citations
12.
Rimkevičienė, Jurgita, John O’Gorman, & Diego De Leo. (2014). Impulsive suicide attempts: A systematic literature review of definitions, characteristics and risk factors. Journal of Affective Disorders. 171. 93–104. 67 indexed citations
13.
Huang, Jia, et al.. (2013). Perceived importance of prospective memory failures in adults with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 24(1). 61–70. 7 indexed citations
14.
Gullo, Matthew J. & John O’Gorman. (2012). DSM-5 Task Force Proposes Controversial Diagnosis for Dishonest Scientists. SSRN Electronic Journal.
15.
Shum, David, et al.. (2012). Effects of aging, planning, and interruption on complex prospective memory. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 23(1). 45–63. 23 indexed citations
16.
Chan, Raymond C. K., Ting Xu, Jia Huang, et al.. (2012). Extending the utility of the Depression Anxiety Stress scale by examining its psychometric properties in Chinese settings. Psychiatry Research. 200(2-3). 879–883. 149 indexed citations
17.
Palk, Gavan R. & John O’Gorman. (2004). Habituation of deviant sexual arousal in sex offenders: The role of cognitive processes. Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety - Qld (CARRS-Q); Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation. 2 indexed citations
18.
Shum, David, Donna Harris, & John O’Gorman. (2000). Effects of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury on Visual Memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 22(1). 25–39. 30 indexed citations
19.
Shum, David, et al.. (1999). Normative Data for a New Memory Test: The Shum Visual Learning Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 13(2). 121–135. 11 indexed citations
20.
O’Gorman, John. (1970). Overextinction of the orienting reaction. PubMed. 5(1). 27–35. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026