John O’Gorman
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- General Psychology top 5%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 13
- Co-authors
- Diego De Leo (10 shared papers)David Shum (16 shared papers)Jurgita Rimkevičienė (11 shared papers)Jacinta Hawgood (9 shared papers)Raymond C. K. Chan (5 shared papers)Jia Huang (2 shared papers)David A.T. Siddle (2 shared papers)Ting Xu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychophysiology (7 papers)Biological Psychology (6 papers)Australian Psychologist (6 papers)Personality and Individual Differences (5 papers)Psychiatry Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
John O’Gorman
87 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Clinical Psychology 590
- General Psychology 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 346
- Applied Psychology 126
- Cognitive Neuroscience 469
Countries citing papers authored by John O’Gorman
This map shows the geographic impact of John O’Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O’Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O’Gorman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John O’Gorman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O’Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O’Gorman. The network helps show where John O’Gorman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John O’Gorman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 149 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 67 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 66 | |
| 5 | 1979 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 63 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 49 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 10 | 1973 | 36 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 14 | 1979 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 17 | 1970 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 26 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 20 | 1979 | 24 |
About John O’Gorman
John O’Gorman is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (590 citations), General Psychology (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (346 citations), Applied Psychology (126 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (469 citations). John O’Gorman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Diego De Leo, David Shum, Jurgita Rimkevičienė, Jacinta Hawgood, Raymond C. K. Chan, Jia Huang, David A.T. Siddle, Ting Xu, Regan Potangaroa and Qing Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Biological Psychology, Australian Psychologist, Personality and Individual Differences and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.