Philip Lackey
About
In The Last Decade
Philip Lackey
9 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Infectious Diseases 397
- Virology 298
- Emergency Medicine 171
- Epidemiology 60
- Hepatology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Lackey
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Lackey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Lackey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Lackey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Lackey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Lackey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Lackey. The network helps show where Philip Lackey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Lackey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Lackey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Lackey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Lackey. Philip Lackey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 167 | |
| 9 | 258 | |
| 10 | Paediatric Airway Clinic: an 18-month experience. | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.