Philip K. Lim

1.1k total citations
37 papers, 835 citations indexed

About

Philip K. Lim is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip K. Lim has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 835 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Surgery, 11 papers in Epidemiology and 7 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Philip K. Lim's work include Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (6 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers). Philip K. Lim is often cited by papers focused on Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (6 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers). Philip K. Lim collaborates with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and United Kingdom. Philip K. Lim's co-authors include Pranela Rameshwar, Shyam A. Patel, Meneka A. Dave, Sarah A. Bliss, Marcelo Taborga, Margarette Bryan, Prem Patel, Steven J. Greco, Claire Linge and Duncan Angus McGrouther and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Philip K. Lim

32 papers receiving 822 citations

Peers

Philip K. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Molecular Biology 392
  • Cancer Research 249
  • Surgery 193
  • Oncology 164
  • Physiology 101
Replace Qi Zhu with:
Qi Zhu China
Cristina Mancini Italy
Mark Orcholski United States
Joseph Cheng United States
Keri Schadler United States
Saman Sizdahkhani United States
Sadhana Jackson United States
Anja Buchheiser Germany
Atsuo Kikuchi Japan
Katherine Huang United States
Qi Zhu China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip K. Lim
Philip K. Lim · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip K. Lim
Philip K. Lim · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip K. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip K. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip K. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip K. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip K. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip K. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip K. Lim. The network helps show where Philip K. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip K. Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip K. Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip K. Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip K. Lim. Philip K. Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 1
5 0
6 7
7 11
8 4
9 6
10 22
11 349
12 20
13 30
14
Challenges in the development of future treatments for breast cancer stem cells
2
15 15
16 18
17 29
18
Abnormal DNA double strand break repair in human oral cancer cells: implication of p53 in the efficacy of DNA end-joining
0
19 113
20 22

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026