Philip J. Bones

2.0k citations
117 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Philip J. Bones

105 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Philip J. Bones
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 557
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 223
  • Radiation 116
  • Signal Processing 137
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 290
Replace Bin Yan with:
Bin Yan China
Hao Dong China
Miguel Arevalillo‐Herráez Spain
Isaac N. Bankman United States
Dana H. Brooks United States
Ana Maria Tomé Portugal
J. Strackee Netherlands
José Antonio Urigüen Spain
David Levin United States
Shu Zhang China
Philip J. Bones relative to Bin Yan China Bin Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Bin Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Bones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Bones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Bones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Bones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Bones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Bones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Bones. The network helps show where Philip J. Bones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip J. Bones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip J. Bones Line = papers co-authored together Philip J. Bones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 202417
4 20239
5 202314
6 20227
7 202229
8 202212
9 201041
10 20097
11 200914
12 20075
13 200684
14 200529
15 200517
16 200523
17
Image reconstruction from incomplete data II : 8-9 July, 2002, Seattle, Washington, USA
200215
18 20018
19 199740
20 199329

About Philip J. Bones

Philip J. Bones is a scholar working on Radiation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Signal Processing and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (21 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (12 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (11 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (10 papers) and Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (557 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (223 citations), Radiation (116 citations), Signal Processing (137 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (290 citations). Philip J. Bones has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard D. Jones, Michael J. Cree, P.R. Davidson, G.J. Carroll, Rick P. Millane, Richard Watts, M.T.R. Peiris, Matthew D. Arnold, Carrie Innes and Govinda Poudel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America A, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Clinical Neurophysiology, Cardiovascular Research and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026