Philip H. Smith
- Co-authors
- Lesley A. BoydJames K. M. BrownJ.H. LouwWillem H. P. BoshoffR. PrinsZ. A. PretoriusR. M. D. KoebnerJames Hadfield
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers)Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (9 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip H. Smith
21 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Plant Science 287
- Genetics 65
- Molecular Biology 64
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
- Cell Biology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Philip H. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip H. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip H. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip H. Smith. The network helps show where Philip H. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip H. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip H. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip H. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip H. Smith. Philip H. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Distribution, status and ecology of Blysmus compressus (L.) Panz. ex Link on the Sefton Coast sand-dunes, Merseyside | 1 |
| 8 | Corynephorus canescens (L.) P. Beauv. (Grey Hair-grass) on the Sefton Coast, Merseyside (v.c. 59) | 1 |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | Revisiting Juncus balticus Willd. in England | 3 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 65 | |
| 16 | 02. Size differences of natterjack toads breeding in the North Merseyside sand dunes | 3 |
| 17 | The distribution, status and conservation of Juncus balticus Willd. in England. | 4 |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Philip H. Smith
Philip H. Smith is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (9 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (287 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations) and Ecological Modeling (10 citations). Philip H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lesley A. Boyd, James K. M. Brown, J.H. Louw, Willem H. P. Boshoff, R. Prins, Z. A. Pretorius, R. M. D. Koebner, James Hadfield, Qian‐Hua Shen and Paula Rodrigues. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Journal, Journal of Animal Ecology and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.