Philip H. Smith

37 total papers · 456 total citations
26 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Philip H. Smith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip H. Smith has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Plant Science, 12 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Philip H. Smith's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (9 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (9 papers). Philip H. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (9 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (9 papers). Philip H. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Philip H. Smith's co-authors include Lesley A. Boyd, James K. M. Brown, Willem H. P. Boshoff, R. Prins, J.H. Louw, Z. A. Pretorius, James Hadfield, R. M. D. Koebner, Graham McGrann and C. Burt and has published in prestigious journals such as The Plant Journal, Journal of Animal Ecology and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Philip H. Smith

22 papers receiving 315 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Philip H. Smith	306	70	68	44	35	26	366
Soichiro Nagano	227 0.7×	40 0.6×	135 2.0×	60 1.4×	16 0.5×	31	350
Tania Quesada	220 0.7×	162 2.3×	97 1.4×	75 1.7×	62 1.8×	19	384
Curt Almqvist	161 0.5×	41 0.6×	85 1.3×	140 3.2×	30 0.9×	28	307
Branko Vreš	202 0.7×	46 0.7×	47 0.7×	64 1.5×	47 1.3×	36	333
Daniel R. Scholes	219 0.7×	64 0.9×	142 2.1×	71 1.6×	14 0.4×	21	383
Aðalsteinn Sigurgeirsson	126 0.4×	82 1.2×	71 1.0×	117 2.7×	22 0.6×	27	347
Karolina Sobierajska	207 0.7×	89 1.3×	58 0.9×	91 2.1×	34 1.0×	20	366
Tolga Ok	168 0.5×	80 1.1×	36 0.5×	77 1.8×	22 0.6×	25	320
Roberta Gargiulo	187 0.6×	121 1.7×	73 1.1×	61 1.4×	23 0.7×	35	371
Yulai Yanbaev	99 0.3×	145 2.1×	126 1.9×	55 1.3×	37 1.1×	41	305

Countries citing papers authored by Philip H. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip H. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip H. Smith. The network helps show where Philip H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip H. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip H. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip H. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip H. Smith. Philip H. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact