Philip G. Williams
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Biotechnology top 0.1%
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- William FenicalPaul R. JensenHiromi MorimotoWesley Y. YoshidaRichard E. MooreValerie J. PaulMelanie‐Jayne R. HowesChristopher A. Kauffman
- Topics
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products (39 papers)Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (34 papers)Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (20 papers)
- Journals
- NatureProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGuam
In The Last Decade
Philip G. Williams
199 papers receiving 6.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Molecular Biology 3.0k
- Pharmacology 1.7k
- Biotechnology 1.3k
- Organic Chemistry 1.2k
- Ecology 647
Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Williams. The network helps show where Philip G. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip G. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip G. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip G. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip G. Williams. Philip G. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis systembreakdown → | 1049 |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 226 | |
| 13 | 97 | |
| 14 | 131 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 116 | |
| 17 | Elevated tritium levels at the World Trade Center | 1 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Philip G. Williams
Philip G. Williams is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Pharmaceutical Science and Pharmacology, having authored 206 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (39 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (34 papers) and Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (1.3k citations), Pharmacology (1.7k citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.2k citations). Philip G. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Guam. Frequent co-authors include William Fenical, Paul R. Jensen, Hiromi Morimoto, Wesley Y. Yoshida, Richard E. Moore, Valerie J. Paul, Melanie‐Jayne R. Howes, Christopher A. Kauffman, Dong‐Chan Oh and Natalia Ivanova. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.