Philip G. Weiler
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard A. KronmalDaniel H. O’LearyBruce M. PsatyPentti M. RautaharjuCurt D. FurbergMaurice B. MittelmarkJulius M. GardinPaul Enright
- Topics
- Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineGeriatrics and GerontologyNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongRussia
In The Last Decade
Philip G. Weiler
39 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.3k
- Physiology 601
- Psychiatry and Mental health 580
- Epidemiology 507
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 492
Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Weiler
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Weiler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Weiler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Weiler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Weiler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Weiler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Weiler. The network helps show where Philip G. Weiler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip G. Weiler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip G. Weiler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip G. Weiler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip G. Weiler. Philip G. Weiler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | Part 9: Behavioral characteristics | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 58 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | The stress of caregivers. | 24 |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 61 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Philip G. Weiler
Philip G. Weiler is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Biological Psychiatry and Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (210 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (61 citations). Philip G. Weiler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Kronmal, Daniel H. O’Leary, Bruce M. Psaty, Pentti M. Rautaharju, Curt D. Furberg, Maurice B. Mittelmark, Julius M. Gardin, Paul Enright, Lewis H. Kuller and Anne B. Newman. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Biological Psychiatry and American Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.