Philip G. Strange
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Immunology top 10%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Anja MüellerDavid A. HallDuncan ArmstrongAlan T. BullAnthony J. BainesDaniel E. KoshlandSarah A. NickollsEamonn Kelly
- Topics
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (116 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (66 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (47 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryThe EMBO Journal
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip G. Strange
178 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Molecular Biology 3.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.5k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 373
- Immunology 364
- Oncology 268
Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Strange
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Strange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Strange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Strange more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Strange
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Strange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Strange. The network helps show where Philip G. Strange may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip G. Strange
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip G. Strange. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip G. Strange based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip G. Strange. Philip G. Strange is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 91 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 73 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | Effect of incubation temperature on (3H) spiperone binding to solubilised neurotransmitter receptors | 1 |
About Philip G. Strange
Philip G. Strange is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 181 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (116 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (66 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (47 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.5k citations), Molecular Biology (3.3k citations) and Virology (120 citations). Philip G. Strange has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anja Müeller, David A. Hall, Duncan Armstrong, Alan T. Bull, Anthony J. Baines, Daniel E. Koshland, Sarah A. Nickolls, Eamonn Kelly, Louise H. Naylor and Nigel Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The EMBO Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.