Philip G. Bowler

6.9k citations
59 papers · 5.2k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 30
Topics
Wound Healing and Treatments (49 papers)Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (22 papers)Antimicrobial agents and applications (14 papers)

In The Last Decade

Philip G. Bowler

59 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Hit Papers

Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Man...20012026200920172001200550010001.5k

Peers

Philip G. Bowler
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Rehabilitation 2.8k
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
  • Surgery 1.2k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 868
  • Organic Chemistry 771
Replace Steven L. Percival with:
Steven L. Percival United Kingdom
David Leaper United Kingdom
Klaus Kirketerp‐Møller Denmark
Joachim Dissemond Germany
John P. Heggers United States
Katja E. Hill United Kingdom
Matthew Malone Australia
Andrew J. McBain United Kingdom
B. I. Duerden United Kingdom
Keith Cutting United Kingdom
Philip G. Bowler relative to Steven L. Percival United Kingdom Steven L. Percival's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Steven L. Percival · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Bowler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Bowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Bowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Bowler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Bowler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Bowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Bowler. The network helps show where Philip G. Bowler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip G. Bowler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip G. Bowler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip G. Bowler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip G. Bowler. Philip G. Bowler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 9
2 10
3 3
4 180
5 17
6 27
7 19
8 14
9 101
10 25
11 15
12 55
13 37
14 96
15
Bacterial resistance to silver in wound carebreakdown →
662
16 45
17 13
18 226
19 19
20 179

About Philip G. Bowler

Philip G. Bowler is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 59 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (49 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (22 papers) and Antimicrobial agents and applications (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (2.8k citations), Occupational Therapy (699 citations) and Microbiology (373 citations). Philip G. Bowler has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David G. Armstrong, B. I. Duerden, Steven L. Percival, David Parsons, Barry J. Davies, Michael G. Walker, Daniel Metcalf, Jennifer Hurlow, Samantha Jones and Randall D. Wolcott. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Clinical Microbiology Reviews and BioMed Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026