Philip E. McClain

646 citations
27 papers · 530 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Philip E. McClain

27 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Philip E. McClain
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Biomaterials 176
  • Animal Science and Zoology 117
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 103
  • Equine 8
Replace Philip H. Long with:
Philip H. Long United States
Shaoyan Si China
Ben‐Shian Huang Taiwan
Yasuhiro Toba Japan
Neil Emmison United Kingdom
R.L. Hartles United Kingdom
Shabnam Abdi Iran
Deepika Sharma India
C. Seco Spain
Effat Omar Malaysia
Philip E. McClain relative to Philip H. Long United States Philip H. Long's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Philip H. Long · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. McClain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. McClain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. McClain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. McClain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. McClain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. McClain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. McClain. The network helps show where Philip E. McClain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. McClain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. McClain Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. McClain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972108
2 198176
3 197746
4 197342
5 197436
6 196935
7 196519
8 197816
9 197116
10 197016
11 196816
12 197211
13
The weight of normal thyroid glands in children.
196611
14 196910
15 19779
16 19659
17 19697
18 19716
19 19736
20 19696

About Philip E. McClain

Philip E. McClain is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Rheumatology and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (15 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (5 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (3 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (176 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (117 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (103 citations) and Equine (8 citations). Philip E. McClain has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eugene R. Wiley, Warren M. Crosby, Jack Metcoff, J. Paul Costiloe, H H Sandstead, C. E. Bodwell, A. M. Pearson, W. L. Anthony, Larry A. Bentle and Frances M. Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Biology and Medicine, Journal of Animal Science, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact