Philip C. Thomas

510 total citations
24 papers, 362 citations indexed

About

Philip C. Thomas is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip C. Thomas has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 362 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 11 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Philip C. Thomas's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (11 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers). Philip C. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (11 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers). Philip C. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. Philip C. Thomas's co-authors include David G. Chamberlain, Josh Hodgson, Michael J. Grigg, M. Ishaque, J. A. F. Rook, Aditya Konar, C. J. Newbold, J. M. Henderson, J. L. Clapperton and Jane Wheelock and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal Of Nutrition, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and The Medical Journal of Australia.

In The Last Decade

Philip C. Thomas

24 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip C. Thomas United Kingdom 11 267 132 60 43 35 24 362
R. S. Reid 9 330 1.2× 143 1.1× 55 0.9× 56 1.3× 6 0.2× 11 420
M. Okamoto Japan 11 229 0.9× 99 0.8× 80 1.3× 22 0.5× 8 0.2× 25 390
D. J. Napper United States 15 657 2.5× 381 2.9× 125 2.1× 59 1.4× 36 1.0× 17 805
M BARRY United States 7 313 1.2× 165 1.3× 76 1.3× 43 1.0× 5 0.1× 12 413
R. I. Smart United Kingdom 12 421 1.6× 217 1.6× 181 3.0× 34 0.8× 3 0.1× 22 544
Dangdang Wang China 12 185 0.7× 83 0.6× 42 0.7× 13 0.3× 12 0.3× 29 378
A. Malestein Netherlands 11 261 1.0× 75 0.6× 46 0.8× 38 0.9× 5 0.1× 20 355
D.B. Vagnoni United States 9 410 1.5× 130 1.0× 90 1.5× 52 1.2× 4 0.1× 12 495
B. B. Andersen Denmark 17 348 1.3× 547 4.1× 399 6.7× 11 0.3× 15 0.4× 52 771
F. Meschy France 12 371 1.4× 137 1.0× 96 1.6× 69 1.6× 5 0.1× 25 490

Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Thomas. The network helps show where Philip C. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Thomas. Philip C. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomas, Philip C.. (2003). Intussusception of a fallopian tube after dilatation and curettage. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 43(2). 169–170. 3 indexed citations
2.
Thomas, Philip C.. (2000). Ensemble computing and the future of personal systems. 2000. 1–1. 2 indexed citations
3.
Thomas, Philip C. & Michael J. Grigg. (1996). CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY IN THE OCTOGENARIAN. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 66(4). 231–234. 32 indexed citations
4.
Thomas, Philip C., et al.. (1994). <title>Star tracker for remote sensing satellites</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2221. 169–178. 1 indexed citations
5.
Newbold, C. J., David G. Chamberlain, & Philip C. Thomas. (1991). Effect of dietary supplements of sodium bicarbonate with or without additional protein on the utilization of nitrogen in the rumen of sheep receiving a lucerne silage-based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 35(3-4). 191–198. 8 indexed citations
6.
Thomas, Philip C.. (1983). Milk protein. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society. 42(3). 407–418. 22 indexed citations
7.
Chamberlain, David G. & Philip C. Thomas. (1983). A note on the use of chromium sesquioxide as a marker in nutritional experiments with dairy cows. Animal Science. 36(1). 155–157. 11 indexed citations
8.
Chamberlain, David G., et al.. (1982). The rate of addition of formic acid to grass at ensilage and the subsequent digestion of the silage in the rumen and intestines of sheep. Grass and Forage Science. 37(2). 159–164. 41 indexed citations
9.
Thomas, Philip C.. (1982). 3.2 Utilization of Conserved Forages. BSAP Occasional Publication. 6. 67–76. 6 indexed citations
10.
Kelly, N. C., Philip C. Thomas, & David G. Chamberlain. (1980). The effect of dietary inclusions of protein on milk secretion and nitrogen retention in cows given silage-barley diets.. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society. 39(3). 3 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Philip C., et al.. (1980). The effect of dietary inclusions of tallow on the citric acid and soluble calcium content of cow's milk.. PubMed. 39(2). 33A–33A. 4 indexed citations
12.
Thomas, Philip C., et al.. (1980). The effect of the concentration and type of protein in the diet on milk secretion and nitrogen retention in the goat.. PubMed. 39(2). 35A–35A. 1 indexed citations
13.
Chamberlain, David G., et al.. (1976). Efficiency of bacterial protein synthesis in the rumen of sheep receiving a diet of sugar beet pulp and barley. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 27(3). 231–238. 23 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Philip C.. (1976). DIET AND MILK PROTEIN PRODUCTION. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 29(1). 31–37. 3 indexed citations
15.
Thomas, Philip C., et al.. (1976). The effect of frequency of feeding on milk secretion in the Ayrshire cow. Journal of Dairy Research. 43(1). 1–7. 25 indexed citations
16.
Hodgson, Josh & Philip C. Thomas. (1975). A relationship between the molar proportion of propionic acid and the clearance rate of the liquid phase in the rumen of the sheep. British Journal Of Nutrition. 33(3). 447–456. 51 indexed citations
17.
Clapperton, J. L., Philip C. Thomas, Martin Stokes, & J. M. Henderson. (1974). A compact machine for feeding sheep up to twelve times daily. British Journal Of Nutrition. 31(2). 271–274. 4 indexed citations
18.
Ishaque, M., Philip C. Thomas, & J. A. F. Rook. (1971). Consequences to the Host of Changes in Rumen Microbial Activity. Nature New Biology. 231(25). 253–256. 40 indexed citations
19.
Thomas, Philip C., et al.. (1971). The effect of the physical form of the diet and the level of feeding on the digestion of dried grass by sheep. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 22(12). 611–615. 34 indexed citations
20.
Konar, Aditya & Philip C. Thomas. (1970). The effect of dehydration and intravenous infusion of vasopressin on milk secretion in the goat.. PubMed. 126(7). Suppl:25–8. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026