Philip C. Reese
- Surgery
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Co-authors
- Bernd SaugelHans O. PinnschmidtDaniel A. ReuterJulia Y. WagnerDaniel I. SesslerJulia Y. NicklasMichael BuerkeMoritz Flick
- Topics
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers)Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip C. Reese
9 papers receiving 273 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Surgery 219
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 216
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 57
- Biomedical Engineering 35
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 27
Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Reese
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Reese's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Reese with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Reese more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Reese
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Reese. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Reese. The network helps show where Philip C. Reese may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Reese
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Reese. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Reese based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Reese. Philip C. Reese is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 56 | |
| 4 | 197 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Comparison of two transdermal nitroglycerin systems: Transderm-Nitro and Nitro-Dur. | 3 |
| 8 | Teaching Logic to Children: An Exploratory Study of "Rocky's Boots." Assessing the Cognitive Consequences of Computer Environments for Learning (ACCCEL). | 2 |
| 9 | The passenger-aircraft interface at the airport terminal | 2 |
About Philip C. Reese
Philip C. Reese is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (57 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (216 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (27 citations). Philip C. Reese has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Saugel, Hans O. Pinnschmidt, Daniel A. Reuter, Julia Y. Wagner, Daniel I. Sessler, Julia Y. Nicklas, Michael Buerke, Moritz Flick, Wolfgang Huber and Lars Budäus. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia and British Journal of Anaesthesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.