Philip B. Coulter

878 total citations
21 papers, 652 citations indexed

About

Philip B. Coulter is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip B. Coulter has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 652 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Philip B. Coulter's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers). Philip B. Coulter is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers). Philip B. Coulter collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Philip B. Coulter's co-authors include Scott J. South, Patrick R. Cotter, Jeffrey Е. Cohen, Asterios Triantafyllou, Malcolm E. Jewell, Glen E. Gordon, Jason E. Hylan, R. Kenneth Godwin, David Carter and David R. Weir and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Administrative Science Quarterly and Public Administration Review.

In The Last Decade

Philip B. Coulter

19 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip B. Coulter United States	9	275	192	155	120	65	21	652
Brian Stipak United States	11	251 0.9×	197 1.0×	126 0.8×	222 1.9×	90 1.4×	25	611
Lewis A. Gunn United Kingdom	4	201 0.7×	248 1.3×	111 0.7×	142 1.2×	31 0.5×	11	793
Robert L. Lineberry United States	13	286 1.0×	425 2.2×	271 1.7×	178 1.5×	20 0.3×	36	844
Patricia A. Wilson United States	11	214 0.8×	107 0.6×	86 0.6×	65 0.5×	61 0.9×	25	538
Sarah Ayres United Kingdom	17	159 0.6×	363 1.9×	122 0.8×	119 1.0×	66 1.0×	55	769
Bernd Marin United Kingdom	9	179 0.7×	286 1.5×	73 0.5×	146 1.2×	25 0.4×	25	662
Paul Lawless United Kingdom	21	310 1.1×	240 1.3×	196 1.3×	78 0.7×	24 0.4×	76	1.1k
Mark A. Glaser United States	11	165 0.6×	144 0.8×	91 0.6×	128 1.1×	30 0.5×	36	409
John W. Raine United Kingdom	11	205 0.7×	124 0.6×	47 0.3×	81 0.7×	26 0.4×	47	432
Wayne Parsons United Kingdom	11	192 0.7×	268 1.4×	83 0.5×	130 1.1×	45 0.7×	17	722

Countries citing papers authored by Philip B. Coulter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip B. Coulter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip B. Coulter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip B. Coulter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip B. Coulter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip B. Coulter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip B. Coulter. The network helps show where Philip B. Coulter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip B. Coulter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip B. Coulter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip B. Coulter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip B. Coulter. Philip B. Coulter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Coulter, Philip B.. (2019). Measuring Inequality. 7 indexed citations

Ohl, Raymond G., et al.. (2015). Large volume, optical and opto-mechanical metrology techniques for ISIM on JWST. 1–15. 1 indexed citations

Coulter, Philip B.. (2010). Democratic Political Development: A Systemic Model Based on Regulative Policy. Development and Change. 3(1). 25–61.

Triantafyllou, Asterios & Philip B. Coulter. (2004). Structural organization of subgemmal neurogenous plaques in foliate papillae of tongue. Human Pathology. 35(8). 991–999. 17 indexed citations

Coulter, Philip B.. (1992). There's a Madness in the Method. Urban Affairs Quarterly. 28(2). 297–316. 14 indexed citations

South, Scott J. & Philip B. Coulter. (1990). Measuring Inequality: A Methodological Handbook.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 19(5). 667–667. 155 indexed citations

Coulter, Philip B., et al.. (1983). Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery. Public Administration Review. 43(1). 50–50. 235 indexed citations

Coulter, Philip B.. (1983). INFERRING THE DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF BUREAUCRATIC DECISION RULES. Policy Studies Journal. 12(2). 347–355. 3 indexed citations

Cotter, Patrick R., Jeffrey Е. Cohen, & Philip B. Coulter. (1982). Race-of-Interviewer Effects in Telephone Interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly. 46(2). 278–278. 97 indexed citations

10.

Coulter, Philip B.. (1981). MEASURING DISTRIBUTIONAL INEQUITY. Policy Studies Journal. 10(2). 396–405. 2 indexed citations

11.

Coulter, Philip B.. (1980). MEASURING THE INEQUITY OF URBAN PUBLIC SERVICES METHODOLOGICAL DISCUSSION WITH APPLICATIONS*. Policy Studies Journal. 8(5). 683–698. 39 indexed citations

12.

Coulter, Philip B.. (1979). Organizational Effectiveness in the Public Sector: The Example of Municipal Fire Protection. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24(1). 65–65. 42 indexed citations

13.

Coulter, Philip B., Peter Bachrach, David Carter, et al.. (1975). In Search of the Master Science: Population Policy in the Seventies. Public Administration Review. 35(4). 419–419. 1 indexed citations

14.

Coulter, Philip B.. (1975). Social mobilization and liberal democracy: A macroquantitative analysis of global and regional models. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 8 indexed citations

15.

Coulter, Philip B.. (1972). Political Development & Political Theory: Methodological & Technological Problems in the Comparative Study of Political DevelopmentPolyarchy: Participation and Opposition. By Robert A. Dahl Macro-Quantitative Analysis: Conflict, Development, and Democratization. By John V. Gillespie and Betty A. Nesvold Politics and the Stages of Growth. By W. W. Rostow. Polity. 5(2). 233–242. 2 indexed citations

16.

Coulter, Philip B.. (1970). Comparative Community Politics & Public Policy: Problems in Theory and Research. Polity. 3(1). 22–43. 13 indexed citations

17.

Coulter, Philip B., et al.. (1969). The Sociological Bases of Party Competition: The Case of Massachusetts. Sociological Quarterly. 10(1). 84–105. 3 indexed citations

18.

Coulter, Philip B., et al.. (1968). Urbanization and Party Competition: Critique and Redirection of Theoretical Research. The Western Political Quarterly. 21(2). 274–288. 5 indexed citations

19.

Coulter, Philip B. & Glen E. Gordon. (1968). Urbanization and Party Competition: Critique and Redirection of Theoretical Research. The Western Political Quarterly. 21(2). 274–274. 2 indexed citations

20.

Coulter, Philip B. & Malcolm E. Jewell. (1963). Senatorial Politics and Foreign Policy. The Western Political Quarterly. 16(3). 731–731. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact