Philip A. Stadter
- Anthropology top 1%
- Archeology top 2%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Organic Chemistry
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Co-authors
- A. W. GommeA. B. BosworthMatthew R. ChristJames TatumHubert M. MartinChester G. StarrCecil H. CloughB. L. Ullman
- Topics
- Classical Antiquity Studies (23 papers)Joseph Conrad and Literature (15 papers)Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (6 papers)
- Cited by
- AnthropologyClassicsArcheology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaModern Language JournalThe American Historical Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip A. Stadter
36 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Anthropology 338
- Archeology 163
- Philosophy 91
- Organic Chemistry 80
- Literature and Literary Theory 65
Countries citing papers authored by Philip A. Stadter
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip A. Stadter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip A. Stadter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip A. Stadter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip A. Stadter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip A. Stadter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip A. Stadter. The network helps show where Philip A. Stadter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip A. Stadter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip A. Stadter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip A. Stadter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip A. Stadter. Philip A. Stadter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | Plutarco fra presente e passato | 0 |
| 6 | Xenophon in Arrian’s Cynegeticus | 3 |
| 7 | Sage and Emperor. Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98-117 A.D. | 20 |
| 8 | Greek lives : a selection of nine Greek lives | 3 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Flavius Arrianus: the New Xenophon | 5 |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | Plutarch's Historical Methods: an analysis of the Mulierum Virtues | 7 |
About Philip A. Stadter
Philip A. Stadter is a scholar working on Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and Classics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (23 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (15 papers) and Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (338 citations), Classics (60 citations) and Archeology (163 citations). Philip A. Stadter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include A. W. Gomme, A. B. Bosworth, Matthew R. Christ, James Tatum, Hubert M. Martin, Chester G. Starr, Cecil H. Clough, B. L. Ullman, David Sansone and Robin Waterfield. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Modern Language Journal and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.